Fruggia.com
Cover art for The Apollo Program

The Apollo Program

From the Fire on Apollo 1 to the Last Landing

  • 20 chapters
  • 45m
  • Aerospace
  • Free · no sign-up
The Apollo 1 fire occurred on January 27, 1967, during a routine test at Launch Operations Center. This tragic accident led to major redesigns of the command module and new safety protocols. The program then moved forward with uncrewed Saturn V and lunar module tests before beginning crewed development missions.

The book covers the political pressure that drove NASA's expansion, the creation of Manned Spacecraft Center, and the organization behind the effort. It details how engineers chose lunar orbit rendezvous as the mission mode, developed the command and service module, and built the Saturn I rocket. Chapters also examine astronaut selection, preparation for crewed flight, program delays, and production lunar landings.

The story includes Apollo 8's historic lunar orbit, Apollo 11's first moon landing, Apollo 13's dramatic failure and recovery, and later scientific landings. It explains why the program ended with Apollo 17 in 1972. This audiobook will appeal to anyone interested in space history and technological achievement.

Listen

  1. 01 Political pressure builds 2m Download (1.3 MB)
    Read this chapter

    In November 1960, John F. Kennedy became president after campaigning on the promise of American superiority over the Soviet Union in space exploration and missile defense. Before that election, Kennedy had spoken out against what he called the "missile gap" between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, a gap he believed had formed because of President Eisenhower’s inaction. For Kennedy, aerospace technology wasn’t just about military strength—it was a symbol of national pride. He pledged that the United States would not just be first, but “first and, first if, but first period.”

    Despite Kennedy's strong words, he didn’t jump to a decision about the Apollo program when he became president. He wasn’t deeply familiar with the technical side of space travel and was hesitant about the huge cost of sending people to the Moon. When NASA Administrator James E. Webb asked for a 30 percent budget boost for the agency, Kennedy backed speeding up the development of large rockets but avoided making a final call on the bigger question.

    After Yuri Gagarin's historic flight into space on April 12, 1961, Americans felt a renewed sense of urgency in the race with the Soviet Union. The news sparked concern across the country, especially among lawmakers. One day later, members of the US House Committee on Science and Astronautics gathered to talk about how the nation should respond. Many of them promised strong backing for a rapid push to get America back on track. President Kennedy, though, did not immediately commit to any specific plan.

    In April, Kennedy asked Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson to assess how the United States was doing in space exploration and to find ways NASA could close the gap. A week later, Johnson responded, saying the nation wasn’t putting forth its full effort or getting the results needed to stay ahead. He added that a Moon landing was still far off, but it was likely the U.S. would be the first to reach it.

    Just twenty days after Freedom 7, the first American crewed spaceflight, President Kennedy presented a Special Message to Congress on Urgent National Needs. In that message, he set forth the ambitious goal of landing Americans on the Moon before the decade was out.

    This nation must embrace a bold new mission in space, one that places America at the forefront of discovery. It is time for a major national effort, a grand endeavor that could shape our path forward. Such progress may hold the answers to challenges we face here on Earth. This moment calls for leadership, ambition, and a commitment to reaching beyond what has come before.

    The United States must pledge to land a person on the Moon and bring him back safely to Earth before the end of this decade. This goal will stand as the most remarkable and significant endeavor in space exploration during this time, and it will also be the most challenging and costly of its kind.

  2. 02 NASA expansion 1m Download (869 KB)
    Read this chapter

    When President Kennedy set the goal of landing on the Moon before 1969, only one American had been into space—just a few weeks prior—and NASA had yet to put a person into orbit. Some at NASA questioned whether such a bold target could be reached. By 1963, Kennedy even nearly agreed to team up with the Soviet Union for a shared Moon mission, aiming to avoid duplicating efforts.

    With the goal of landing humans on the moon now clear, NASA moved quickly to streamline its efforts. They threw out earlier designs from Convair, GE, and Martin, and instead chose Faget’s command and service module plan. The mission module was seen as just extra space, so unnecessary. In October 1961, that design became the basis for a new competition for spacecraft contracts. On November 28, 1961, North American Aviation won the bid, even though its proposal wasn’t rated as strong as Martin’s. Webb, Dryden, and Robert Seamans picked North American because of its long history with NASA and its predecessor.

    To land humans on the Moon by the end of 1969, the United States made the largest peacetime financial commitment in its history, spending $25 billion—equivalent to $187 billion today. That effort demanded an unprecedented surge in innovation and mobilized resources on a scale never seen before. At its height, the Apollo program directly employed 400,000 people and relied on the involvement of more than 20,000 industrial firms and universities across the country.

    On July 1, 1960, NASA created the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. This center was responsible for designing the powerful Saturn rockets needed for the Apollo missions. The Saturn vehicles were heavy lift-class launch systems, built to carry astronauts far beyond Earth. This facility played a key role in preparing for lunar exploration.

  3. 03 Manned Spacecraft Center 1m Download (882 KB)
    Read this chapter

    Robert R. Gilruth’s Space Task Group had been running the nation’s crewed space program from Langley Research Center, but it became clear that managing the Apollo program would need more resources. So Gilruth was given the job of expanding his team into a full NASA center called the Manned Spacecraft Center. The location was chosen in Houston, Texas, on land donated by Rice University. NASA Administrator Webb announced the new center on September 19, 1961. At the same time, it was also clear that NASA would soon need to move mission control away from Cape Canaveral in Florida, so a new Mission Control Center would be built as part of the MSC.

    By September 1962, two astronauts from Project Mercury had already circled Earth. That's when Gilruth relocated his team to leased offices in Houston, while work began on the new MSC building. At that time, Kennedy made a trip to Rice University to renew his bold promise in a well-known address.

    Why, some have asked, the Moon? Why set such a goal? They might well wonder why climb the highest mountain, or why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic. These questions capture the spirit of ambition that led the United States to commit to landing humans on the Moon. The Apollo Program was not simply about reaching a distant celestial body—it was about pushing the limits of what humanity could achieve. The challenge was immense, yet the nation chose to rise to it, driven by the boldness of exploration and the unknown.

    In this decade, we will accept the challenge to go to the Moon, not because it is simple, but because it is difficult. This goal will bring our best efforts and abilities together, and we are determined to meet this challenge head-on. We intend to win.

    The Manned Spacecraft Center opened in September 1963. Later, after Lyndon B. Johnson died in 1973, Congress renamed it in his honor.

  4. 04 Launch Operations Center 1m Download (705 KB)
    Read this chapter

    Apollo would soon need bigger launch facilities than those at Canaveral in Florida. By July 1961, work had already begun on two new complexes for the Saturn I and IB rockets at the northern end of the site: LC-34 and LC-37. But since the lunar missions required an even larger rocket, plans were made for a new Launch Operations Center. This facility was to be built immediately north of Canaveral, on Merritt Island.

    Kurt H. Debus, who had worked on the original V-2 rocket team with Wernher von Braun, was in charge of designing and building the center that would become the Launch Operations Center. He was named the first director of the LOC. Construction started in November 1962. After President Kennedy died, President Johnson signed an executive order on November 29, 1963, renaming the facility and Cape Canaveral to honor Kennedy.

    The Launch Operations Center included Launch Complex 39, with a massive Vertical Assembly Building standing thirty-seven hundred thousand cubic meters big, where the rockets and spacecraft were put together on a mobile platform and then moved by crawler-transporter to one of two launch pads—A and B—that were finished in October 1965. There was also an Operations and Checkout Building for receiving the Gemini and Apollo spacecraft before they were attached to their rockets. The spacecraft could be tested in special vacuum chambers that simulated conditions up to seventy-six kilometers high, nearly a vacuum.

  5. 05 Organization 1m Download (794 KB)
    Read this chapter

    Administrator Webb knew he had to improve project management if Apollo was going to stay within budget, so he brought in George E. Mueller for a key leadership role. Mueller agreed, but only if he could help reorganize NASA to better handle the Apollo program. With support from Deputy Administrator Seamans, Webb restructured the Office of Manned Space Flight. On July 23, 1963, Webb announced that Mueller would become Deputy Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight, replacing D. Brainerd Holmes, who was retiring in September. Under this new setup, the heads of three major centers — the Manned Spacecraft Center led by Gilruth, Marshall Space Flight Center under von Braun, and the Launch Operations Center with Debus — all answered directly to Mueller.

    After reviewing Air Force missile projects, Mueller knew he could find skilled managers among high-ranking officers, so he got Webb’s approval to bring in General Samuel C. Phillips, who had led the Minuteman program successfully. Phillips became the OMSF program controller. His boss, Bernard A. Schriever, agreed to lend him and his team, but with the condition that Phillips be made Apollo Program Director. Mueller accepted, and Phillips took charge in January 1964, leading the program until July 1969, when the first human landing was achieved, after which he returned to Air Force duty.

    In his book One Giant Leap, Charles Fishman gave a striking estimate of how many hands touched the Apollo program: 410,000 men and women working across roughly 20,000 different companies all contributed to the effort.

  6. 06 Choosing a mission mode 4m Download (2.1 MB)
    Read this chapter

    Once Kennedy had defined the goal of landing on the Moon, Apollo mission planners had to figure out how to build a spacecraft that could do it safely, without spending too much money or pushing technology and astronauts too far. They looked at four different plans. One was called Direct Ascent, where the whole spacecraft would launch as one unit and go straight to the lunar surface, skipping orbit. In this plan, a 50,000-pound Earth return ship would land all three astronauts on top of a 113,000-pound descent stage, which would stay behind on the Moon. This design needed a very powerful launch vehicle, the Saturn C-8 or Nova, to carry a 163,000-pound payload to the Moon.

    The Apollo Program considered several approaches to getting to the Moon, and one of the main debates centered on how to assemble the spacecraft in space. Earth Orbit Rendezvous, or EOR, would require many rocket launches—up to fifteen in some plans—to send pieces of a Direct Ascent spacecraft and propulsion units into orbit, where they'd be put together. Another option was Lunar Surface Rendezvous, which involved launching two spacecraft one after the other. The first would be an automated vehicle carrying fuel for the return trip, landing on the Moon. Later, a crewed vehicle would follow, and propellant would be transferred from the automated vehicle to the crewed one.

    In early 1961, NASA generally favored direct ascent as the mission mode. Many engineers were worried that rendezvous and docking—maneuvers never attempted in Earth orbit—would be nearly impossible in lunar orbit. But John Houbolt at Langley Research Center campaigned tirelessly for Lunar Orbit Rendezvous, sending memos and reports to Associate Administrator Robert Seamans. “Somewhat as a voice in the wilderness,” he pleaded that LOR should not be dismissed. Though initially seen as too risky, this method was ultimately chosen for Apollo 11’s success on July 20, 1969. That mission used a single Saturn V to launch a 96,886-pound spacecraft composed of a command and service module and a two-stage Lunar Module. The Lunar Module landed on the Moon, then returned an ascent stage to dock with the command module in lunar orbit before being discarded.

    In July 1961, Seamans created a committee led by Nicholas E. Golovin to pick a launch vehicle for the Apollo program, marking a key moment in choosing the mission mode. The group recommended a hybrid EOR-LOR approach, and their work helped bring LOR into consideration. Houbolt’s efforts also pushed the idea forward. By late 1961 and early 1962, engineers at the Manned Spacecraft Center began supporting LOR, including Joseph Shea, who became a strong advocate. The Marshall Space Flight Center engineers, who favored direct ascent, were slower to change their minds, but Wernher von Braun announced their conversion at a briefing on June 7, 1962.

    After NASA settled on its plan, the path forward remained turbulent. Kennedy's science advisor Jerome Wiesner, who had long opposed human spaceflight, brought in former NASA official Golovin to lead a "Space Vehicle Panel" meant to monitor but effectively undermining NASA's choices about the Saturn V rocket and Lunar Orbit Rendezvous method. This effort delayed public announcement until July 11, 1962, and forced Webb to call the decision "tentative." Wiesner continued pressuring, even making the disagreement public during a two-day visit by the President to Marshall Space Flight Center, where he interrupted von Braun's presentation and bluntly said, "No, that's no good," in front of the press. Webb defended von Braun until Kennedy ended the argument by saying the matter was "still subject to final review." Still, Webb moved forward with issuing a request for proposals to Lunar Excursion Module contractors. Wiesner eventually backed down, unwilling to settle the issue directly with Kennedy during the October Cuban Missile Crisis, fearing Kennedy's support for Webb. NASA named Grumman as the LEM contractor in November 1962.

    Without NASA adopting this minority position in 1962, the U.S. might have reached the Moon, but not by the end of the decade—President Kennedy’s deadline. The Lunar Orbit Rendezvous method allowed the lunar module to act as a lifeboat if the command ship failed. Some documents show this idea was discussed before and after the choice was made. In 1964, an MSC study concluded, “The LM [as lifeboat] ... was finally dropped, because no single reasonable CSM failure coul”

  7. 07 Command and service module 1m Download (886 KB)
    Read this chapter

    The command module was the crew cabin of the Apollo spacecraft, shaped like a cone and built to carry three astronauts from Earth all the way to lunar orbit and back again. It was the only part of the spacecraft that stayed basically unchanged as the program developed. The module had a heat shield on the outside to protect it during reentry, and small engines for controlling its direction in space. It also carried parachutes to slow its fall when it landed in the ocean. Standing about eleven feet four inches tall and twelve feet eight inches across, the command module weighed just under twelve thousand two hundred fifty pounds.

    The service module was a cylindrical part of the spacecraft that worked alongside the command module, equipped with a service propulsion engine, RCS thrusters, and a fuel cell system using liquid hydrogen and oxygen to generate power. It carried a high-gain S-band antenna for communication during lunar missions and, on longer flights, an orbital scientific instrument package. The module was 24.6 feet long and 12.83 feet across, weighing about 51,300 pounds when fully fueled for early lunar missions, or just over 54,000 pounds with the scientific equipment. It separated from the spacecraft just before reentry and was discarded.

    North American Aviation was chosen to build the Command and Service Module, as well as the second stage of the Saturn V rocket. When the CSM design began, lunar orbit rendezvous hadn't been decided yet, so the service propulsion engine was built to lift the module off the Moon—about twice the power needed for the trip there. There was no way for it to dock with the lunar module either. In 1964, a study concluded that the original design should continue as Block I for early testing, while Block II would be the real lunar spacecraft, including docking equipment and improvements based on what was learned during Block I development.

  8. 08 Saturn I 1m Download (794 KB)
    Read this chapter

    Saturn I was the United States’ first heavy lift launch vehicle, designed to test CSMs in low Earth orbit before Apollo missions could proceed. The rocket's first stage, called the S-I, used eight H-1 engines burning RP-1 and liquid oxygen, producing 1.5 million pounds-force of thrust. Its second stage, the S-IV, carried six RL10 engines fueled by liquid hydrogen and generated 90,000 pounds-force of thrust. The third stage, the S-V, was included on four Saturn I flights but did not fire during those missions.

    The Saturn I rocket began its test flights from Launch Complex 34, with only the first stage active and dummy upper stages filled with water. The first launch carrying a live S-IV stage came from Launch Complex 37. Then, in 1964 and 1965, five more launches followed, each sending boilerplate Command and Service Modules—designated AS-101 through AS-105—into orbit. The final three of these missions also carried Pegasus satellites, which were meant to check the safety of the translunar environment by measuring micrometeorite impacts.

    In September 1962, NASA originally intended to send four crewed Command and Service Module flights aboard the Saturn I rocket between late 1965 and 1966, all while Project Gemini was underway. That plan relied on the rocket's 22,500-pound carrying capacity, which was not enough to support all the systems needed for such missions. As a result, by October 1963, NASA decided to switch to using the more powerful Saturn IB rocket for every crewed Earth orbital flight.

  9. 09 Astronauts 2m Download (988 KB)
    Read this chapter

    During the Apollo program, Donald K. "Deke" Slayton served as NASA's director of flight crew operations. He was one of the original Mercury Seven astronauts, but in September 1962, he was medically grounded due to a heart murmur. Despite not flying himself, Slayton remained deeply involved, responsible for making all the crew assignments for both the Gemini and Apollo missions.

    Thirty-two astronauts were chosen to fly in the Apollo program, and twenty-four of them traveled beyond Earth’s orbit to circle the Moon between December 1968 and December 1972. Three of those flew more than once. Half of them stepped onto the lunar surface, though none ever returned to it after their first landing. One of the moonwalkers had a background in geology. The mission faced tragedy when Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee lost their lives during a test on the ground meant to prepare for Apollo 1.

    The astronauts chosen for the Apollo missions came from the original Mercury and Gemini programs, as well as two additional astronaut groups. All Apollo mission commanders were veterans from Gemini or Mercury. The early Apollo flights, including the first two lunar landings on Apollo 11 and Apollo 12, had at least two, sometimes three, Gemini veterans on board. Harrison Schmitt was the first scientist astronaut selected by NASA, and he flew on the final Apollo mission, Apollo 17, landing on the Moon. He also trained all the Apollo landing crews in lunar geology.

    NASA presented the Distinguished Service Medal to all 32 astronauts for "distinguished service, ability, or courage" and contributions vital to the NASA mission. Grissom, White, and Chaffee received the honor posthumously in 1969, followed by succeeding crews starting with Apollo 8. The Apollo 7 mission, flown by Walter M. Schirra, Donn Eisele, and Walter Cunningham, was initially given the lesser Exceptional Service Medal due to issues with following flight director orders. In October 2008, the NASA Administrator changed that decision, awarding the Distinguished Service Medal to the Apollo 7 crew, with Schirra and Eisele getting theirs after their deaths.

  10. 10 Preparation for crewed flight 2m Download (1.1 MB)
    Read this chapter

    The Apollo program's Block I configuration called for two orbital missions with crewed flights: AS-204 and AS-205. Each mission would carry a crew of three, with roles defined as Command Pilot, Senior Pilot, and Pilot. The Senior Pilot was responsible for navigation, while the Pilot handled systems engineering tasks. All astronauts were scheduled to wear a modified Gemini spacesuit during these flights.

    Following the AS-206 test flight, the next step involved sending astronauts aboard the first Block II Command and Lunar Modules in a paired mission known as AS-207/208 or AS-278. Each vehicle was launched separately using a Saturn IB rocket. The crew was assigned to three roles: Commander, Command Module Pilot, and Lunar Module Pilot. They began wearing the new Apollo A6L suit, built specifically for moonwalks. This suit featured a clear "fishbowl" helmet instead of the earlier visor style, improving visibility, and included a water-cooled undergarment for use during surface activities.

    Deke Slayton picked the first Apollo crew in January 1966, naming Grissom as Command Pilot, White as Senior Pilot, and Donn F. Eisele as Pilot. But Eisele hurt his shoulder twice during training flights and had surgery on January 27, so Slayton replaced him with Chaffee. NASA announced the final crew for AS-204 on March 21, 1966, with backup crew members James McDivitt and David Scott, plus rookie Russell L. "Rusty" Schweickart. Then, on September 29, NASA named Wally Schirra, Eisele, and rookie Walter Cunningham as the prime crew for AS-205.

    In December 1966, the AS-205 mission was called off because the spacecraft's capabilities would be tested during the 14-day first flight, making AS-205 unnecessary for gathering new engineering data. The Saturn IB rocket originally meant for AS-205 was then assigned to a new dual mission, now called AS-205/208 or AS-258, scheduled for August 1967. Jim McDivitt, Scott, and Schweickart were promoted to the main crew for this flight, while Schirra, Eisele, and Cunningham became the backup crew for Apollo 1.

  11. 11 Program delays 1m Download (801 KB)
    Read this chapter

    The spacecraft for the AS-202 and AS-204 missions arrived at Kennedy Space Center from North American Aviation with numerous equipment issues that needed fixing before they could fly. Because of these problems, the launch of AS-202 was delayed behind AS-203, and the hope that the first crewed mission might launch as early as November 1966—around the same time as the final Gemini flight—was gone. Finally, the planned date for the AS-204 mission was moved up to February 21, 1967.

    North American Aviation was responsible not just for the Apollo Command and Service Module, but also for the Saturn V S-II second stage. Because of delays with that stage, the first uncrewed test flight of the Saturn V, designated AS-501, was pushed back from late 1966 to November 1967. During the initial assembly of AS-501, engineers had to use a dummy spacer spool in place of the actual second stage.

    In late 1965, problems at North American Aviation grew so serious that Manned Space Flight Administrator George Mueller tasked program director Samuel Phillips with leading a "tiger team" to assess the situation. Phillips delivered his report in a letter dated December 19 to NAA president Lee Atwood, a copy of which included a strongly worded note from Mueller himself. He also shared the results of his investigation with Mueller and Deputy Administrator Robert Seamans. During this same period, Grumman faced its own setbacks with the Lunar Module, delaying any prospects of crewed missions until after 1967—just after the initial crewed flights of the Command and Service Module were set to begin.

  12. 12 Apollo 1 fire 2m Download (1.1 MB)
    Read this chapter

    Grissom, White, and Chaffee named their mission Apollo 1, choosing that title to focus their efforts on the first crewed flight. They trained and tested their spacecraft at North American, and also in the altitude chamber at Kennedy Space Center. A "plugs-out" test was scheduled for January, meant to mimic a launch countdown from LC-34, where the spacecraft would switch from pad-supplied power to its internal systems. If that went well, it would lead to a more intense countdown simulation closer to February 21, when both the capsule and rocket would be fueled.

    The plugs-out test started on the morning of January 27, 1967, and ran into trouble almost immediately. The crew smelled something strange in their spacesuits, which delayed sealing the hatch. Communications issues followed, halting the simulated countdown. During the pause, an electrical fire broke out inside the cabin. It spread fast in the high-pressure, 100% oxygen environment. The heat caused the inner wall to burst, sending flames onto the pad. Rescue efforts failed because the hatch couldn’t be opened in time. The astronauts died before they could be saved.

    NASA quickly formed an accident review board, with oversight from both houses of Congress. The board found that problems in the command module's design, workmanship, and quality control had led to the fire. Under pressure from NASA Administrator Webb, North American Aviation removed Harrison Storms from his role as command module program manager. Webb also changed leadership at the Apollo Spacecraft Program Office, reassigning Joseph Francis Shea and replacing him with George Low.

    To fix the problems that led to the fire, NASA changed how the Block II spacecraft was built and how missions were run. The crew would no longer breathe pure oxygen, but instead a mix of nitrogen and oxygen. They also removed any materials in the cabin or space suits that could catch fire easily. The Block II design already planned to replace the old plug-type hatch with a new quick-release door that opened outward. Because of the dangers shown by the fire, NASA stopped using the Block I spacecraft for crewed flights. They would only use those for uncrewed tests of the Saturn V rocket. Everyone would wear special, fire-resistant A7L space suits made for Block II, and they’d be given Block II crew titles, even if there was no lunar module on the mission.

  13. 13 Uncrewed Saturn V and LM tests 3m Download (1.6 MB)
    Read this chapter

    On April 24, 1967, Mueller announced a new Apollo mission numbering system, assigning sequential numbers to all flights, whether crewed or uncrewed. The series would begin with Apollo 4, reserving the earlier designations for the first three uncrewed tests. The number Apollo 1 was retired, honoring the crew who died in the fire, as their widows had requested.

    In September 1967, Mueller approved a plan for a series of missions to reach a crewed lunar landing, with each step completed before the next could begin. Instead of numbers, letters labeled them: A missions were uncrewed Saturn V tests; B tested Lunar Module with Saturn IB; C was a crewed Earth orbit test of Command and Service Module with Saturn IB; D marked first crewed flight of both CSM and LM using single Saturn V launch. E would take crew higher in Earth orbit, F would be a lunar mission testing LM in lunar orbit without landing, and G would be the first crewed lunar landing. The plan also included missions H through J for future lunar exploration.

    Apollo 4, known as AS-501, launched on November 9, 1967, as the first uncrewed test flight of the Saturn V rocket. It carried a Block I Command and Service Module, delayed by the fire on Apollo 1 that had pushed back the crewed missions. The mission tested the command module’s heat shield by using the service module’s engine to slam it into the atmosphere at higher-than-normal reentry speeds. This allowed engineers to verify the shield could handle the extreme conditions of a trans-lunar return trip. The delay gave NASA time to human-rate both the Saturn V and the Lunar Module, ensuring they were ready for future crewed flights.

    Apollo 5, also known as AS-204, was the first uncrewed test flight of the lunar module in Earth orbit. It launched on January 22, 1968, from pad 37 aboard the Saturn IB rocket that would later have been used for Apollo 1. The mission tested the lunar module's engines, which successfully fired and restarted despite a computer programming error that shortened the first descent stage burn. The ascent engine was fired in abort mode, a test called “fire-in-the-hole,” where it lit at the same time the descent stage was jettisoned. Although Grumman wanted a second uncrewed flight, George Low decided the next lunar module mission would carry astronauts.

    On April 4, 1968, Apollo 6, or AS-502, launched with a Command and Service Module and a Lunar Module Test Article as ballast, aiming to test trans-lunar injection and a direct-return abort using the service module engine for high-speed reentry. The Saturn V suffered from pogo oscillation due to unstable engine combustion, damaging fuel lines in the second and third stages. Two engines in the second stage shut down early, but the remaining engines compensated. The damage to the third stage engine was severe enough that it couldn’t restart for trans-lunar injection. Mission controllers used the service module engine to repeat the Apollo 4 flight profile. With Apollo 6’s performance and fixes for its issues confirmed, NASA declared the Saturn V ready for crewed flights, canceling a third uncrewed test.

  14. 14 Crewed development missions 2m Download (1.1 MB)
    Read this chapter

    Apollo 7 launched from Launch Complex 34 on October 11, 1968. The mission was crewed by Wally Schirra, Don Eisele, and Rusty Cunningham. It lasted eleven days and stayed in Earth orbit, where it tested the Command and Service Module systems.

    Apollo 8 was meant to be the D mission in December 1968 with McDivitt, Scott, and Schweickart crewing it, launched on a Saturn V instead of two Saturn IBs. By summer, it became clear the lunar module wouldn't be ready, so ASPO Manager George Low proposed sending Apollo 8 to orbit the Moon instead. That moved the D mission to March 1969 and removed the E mission entirely, keeping the program on schedule. The Soviet Union had already sent tortoises, mealworms, fruit flies, and other lifeforms around the Moon in September 1968 on Zond 5, and it was believed they might soon attempt a human flight. The plan wasn't revealed until after Apollo 7. Gemini veterans Frank Borman and Jim Lovell, joined by rookie William Anders, captivated the world by making ten lunar orbits in twenty hours, broadcasting images of the Moon's surface on Christmas Eve, and returning safely to Earth.

    In March 1969, Apollo 9 tested the lunar module’s flight capabilities, its ability to rendezvous and dock in Earth orbit, while Schweickart also evaluated the full lunar EVA suit along with its portable life support system outside the spacecraft. Then, in May 1969, the F mission was performed by Apollo 10, a crew of Thomas P. Stafford, John Young, and Eugene Cernan—veterans from the Gemini program. During that mission, Stafford and Cernan navigated the lunar module within 50,000 feet, or about 15 kilometers, of the Moon’s surface.

    On July 20, 1969, at 20:17:40 UTC, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin made history as the first humans to land on the Moon at the Sea of Tranquility. They were part of an all-Gemini veteran crew aboard Apollo 11, joined by Michael Collins who remained in lunar orbit. Armstrong and Aldrin spent 21 hours and 36 minutes on the surface, with 2 hours and 31 minutes spent outside the spacecraft, walking, taking photographs, collecting samples, and placing scientific instruments. The mission broadcast black-and-white television back to Earth continuously. They returned safely on July 24.

  15. 15 Production lunar landings 2m Download (1.1 MB)
    Read this chapter

    In November 1969, Charles "Pete" Conrad became the third person to step onto the Moon. He spoke more informally than had Neil Armstrong, who took the first steps during the same mission. Conrad's words were a quieter contrast to Armstrong’s historic phrasing, but still carried the weight of history. The lunar surface held the mark of human exploration, and with each step, the world watched. This was not just a landing, but a continuation of humanity's reach beyond Earth. The Moon had become a place where men could walk, and Pete Conrad was among them.

    Pilot Pete Conrad and lunar module pilot Alan L. Bean successfully landed Apollo 12 near the Surveyor 3 probe, which had touched down on the Ocean of Storms in April 1967. The command module was flown by Richard F. Gordon Jr., a Gemini veteran. Conrad and Bean carried the first color television camera to the Moon’s surface, though it was damaged when pointed toward the Sun. During two extravehicular activities totaling 7 hours and 45 minutes, they walked over to Surveyor 3, took photographs, and collected parts to bring back to Earth.

    After Apollo 11, NASA shared plans for eight more lunar landing sites, with the final five missions set to carry more mass and improve the Saturn V's payload capacity. These later missions would mix the I and J types from the 1967 list, letting the Command Module Pilot operate orbital sensors while companions explored the surface, and allowing stays of over three days. The Lunar Roving Vehicle would also be included, expanding exploration range and enabling televised LM liftoffs. A revised Block II spacesuit was developed to support extended missions, offering better flexibility and visibility for driving the LRV.

    Apollo 13 launched in April 1970 with Jim Lovell, Jack Swigert, and Fred Haise bound for the Fra Mauro formation. Two days into the mission, a liquid oxygen tank exploded, disabling the service module and leaving the crew to rely on the lunar module as a lifeboat for their return to Earth. A NASA review board was convened to investigate, discovering that the failure resulted from damage to the tank during manufacturing and a subcontractor’s failure to follow updated design specs. As a result, Apollo missions were grounded for the rest of 1970 while engineers redesigned the oxygen tank and added an extra one.

  16. 16 Mission cutbacks 1m Download (887 KB)
    Read this chapter

    By 1969, just after the first moon landing, NASA decided to change how they'd planned to launch Skylab, the orbital laboratory. Instead of building it in space using several Saturn IB rockets, they opted to pre-assemble it on the ground and launch it with a single Saturn V. That plan eliminated Apollo 20. At the same time, NASA’s budget began shrinking, and funds had to be redirected toward developing the Space Shuttle. By 1971, missions 18 and 19 were also canceled. The two Saturn Vs that weren’t used were displayed as museum exhibits at several space centers: the John F. Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the George C. Marshall Space Center in Huntsville, Alabama, the Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas.

    The cutbacks changed how mission planners approached the moon landings, requiring them to rethink the original sites in order to get the most useful geological samples and data from just four missions left. Apollo 15 was originally meant to be the final H series mission, but with only two missions following, it became the first of three J series flights instead.

    Apollo 13's Fra Mauro mission was reassigned to Apollo 14, which launched in February 1971. Alan Shepard, a Mercury program veteran, commanded the flight alongside Stuart Roosa and Edgar Mitchell. This time, the mission succeeded. Shepard and Mitchell spent over thirty-three hours on the lunar surface, completing two extravehicular activities that lasted a total of nine hours and twenty-four minutes.

    In August 1971, after the Apollo 15 mission ended, President Richard Nixon suggested canceling the final two lunar missions, Apollo 16 and 17. The Office of Management and Budget deputy director, Caspar Weinberger, disagreed with that plan. He talked Nixon out of it, convincing him to go ahead with the remaining missions.

  17. 17 Samples returned 2m Download (981 KB)
    Read this chapter

    The Apollo program brought back more than 382 kilograms of lunar material, rocks and soil, to a lab in Houston called the Lunar Receiving Laboratory. In 1979, they built a new facility just for storing these samples, the Lunar Sample Laboratory Facility. Today, about three-quarters of all the moon rocks and dirt collected during the Apollo missions are kept inside that building.

    The rocks brought back from the Moon are much older than those found on Earth, with ages ranging from about 3.2 billion years in the maria regions to as old as 4.6 billion years in the highlands. One key sample, called the Genesis Rock, was picked up by astronauts David Scott and James Irwin during Apollo 15. This anorthosite is nearly all calcium-rich feldspar and reflects the makeup of the Moon’s crust. Another discovery, from Apollo 12, revealed a geochemical feature known as KREEP, which has no match on Earth. These samples helped scientists understand that the Moon's outer layer was once entirely molten, a theory supported by the presence of anorthositic material.

    The Moon rocks brought back by the Apollo missions reveal a history shaped by countless impacts. Many samples bear the scars of micrometeoroid strikes, craters that don’t appear on Earth rocks due to our protective atmosphere. These same rocks also show signs of being hit by forces so intense they created shock waves, evidence of high-pressure events. Some samples are impact melts—materials that melted near a crater. And because the Moon has no weather or erosion, all the rocks are highly brecciated, meaning they’ve been shattered and reassembled multiple times by impacts over billions of years.

    The Moon's origins were revealed through studying samples brought back from lunar missions. Scientists examined these materials and concluded that the Moon formed from the collision between Earth and a large celestial object. This impact theory explains the Moon's composition and its relationship to our planet. The findings came from careful analysis of what was returned from space, offering new understanding about how our natural satellite came to be.

  18. 18 Costs 1m Download (806 KB)
    Read this chapter

    The Apollo program cost a total of nearly 26 billion dollars, with 20.2 billion going toward the Saturn rockets, the Apollo spacecraft, spacesuits, experiments, and mission operations. An additional 5.2 billion was spent on ground facilities like NASA’s human spaceflight centers and the worldwide network of tracking stations that supported the missions. Adjusted for inflation, those figures would be roughly 149 billion and 38.3 billion dollars today.

    The price tag for Apollo climbs to $28 billion, which equals about $280 billion when adjusted for today’s money. That number includes not just the main mission, but also other projects like Project Gemini and the robotic Ranger, Surveyor, and Lunar Orbiter programs that helped make it all possible.

    In the early 1960s, no one really knew how much human spaceflight would cost. NASA’s first guesses were between seven and twelve billion dollars for a crewed mission to the moon. But when NASA Administrator James Webb reported that number to Vice President Johnson in April 1961, he had bumped it up to twenty billion dollars. That was the estimate they gave to the government.

    Project Apollo was the largest research and development effort in peacetime, employing over 400,000 people and contractors at its peak, and consuming more than half of NASA’s budget during the 1960s. After the first Moon landing, public and political interest faded, including that of President Nixon, who wanted to control federal spending. NASA struggled to fund Apollo missions, which cost an average of $445 million each—equivalent to $2.73 billion today—while also developing the Space Shuttle. The final year Apollo received funding was 1973.

  19. 19 Apollo Applications Program 1m Download (684 KB)
    Read this chapter

    After the Apollo missions ended, NASA began exploring new uses for the hardware. One idea was the Apollo Extension Series, or Apollo X, which would use the Spacecraft Lunar Module Adapter to carry a small orbital lab. Astronauts would travel to this station in the Command and Service Module. Later, engineers designed a bigger orbital workshop built from an S-IVB Saturn stage, leading to the full Apollo Applications Program. A special instrument platform called the Apollo Telescope Mount could be attached to a lunar module's ascent stage. The most ambitious plan even imagined using an empty S-IVB as a spacecraft for a Venus fly-by mission.

    The S-IVB stage, originally intended for various orbital workshop concepts, became the reality of Skylab, the first American space station. Built on the ground instead of in orbit, it launched in 1973 aboard the lower two stages of a Saturn V rocket. The station carried an Apollo Telescope Mount for solar observations. Its final crew left Skylab on February 8, 1974. The structure returned to Earth in 1979, falling from the sky after delays in the Space Shuttle program made its rescue impossible.

    The Apollo–Soyuz program marked a historic moment when Apollo hardware was used for the first joint spaceflight between nations. This collaboration set the stage for future international efforts in space, including the Space Shuttle and International Space Station programs.

  20. 20 Recent observations 2m Download (1 MB)
    Read this chapter

    In 2008, Japan's SELENE probe orbiting the Moon spotted something unusual near the Apollo 15 landing site—it found evidence of a glowing halo around the blast crater left by the lunar module's descent engine. The probe was flying above the surface at the time, capturing this data from afar. This observation added to what scientists already knew about the effects of the module's landing on the lunar soil. The SELENE mission provided new details about how the Moon's surface reacts to such impacts. It also reminded researchers of earlier Apollo missions and their lasting marks on the Moon. The findings were part of a broader effort to study the lunar environment in greater depth. This was not just a passing glance, but a careful look at what happened during one of humanity's most ambitious endeavors.

    Since 2009, NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been circling the Moon at about 50 kilometers above its surface, taking photos of the Apollo program's leftover equipment and landing sites. The orbiter captured images of all the flags planted by American astronauts during the Apollo missions. Most of these flags are still standing, except for the one from Apollo 11, which was knocked over during liftoff. It’s not known how much color remains in those flags. One thing is certain — even though they’re on the Moon, the flags can’t be seen from Earth through a telescope.

    There’s something deeply wistful about these photographs of the Apollo landing sites. The detail is so sharp that if Neil Armstrong were walking there now, we could make him out—his footsteps even—like the astronaut footpath clearly visible in the photos of the Apollo 14 site. Perhaps the wistfulness comes from the sense of simple grandeur in those missions. Perhaps it’s also a reminder of the risk felt after the Eagle had landed—the chance that it might be unable to lift off again and leave the astronauts stranded on the Moon. But it may also be that a photograph like this one is as close as we’re able to come to looking directly back into the human past.

    There it stands, that same lunar module, resting exactly where it came to rest forty years ago, as though forty years had never passed at all, as if the decades since were nothing more than a dream.

Read

Free to download, keep and share. For general information only — not professional medical, legal or financial advice. Please consult a qualified professional.

← All audiobooks