The Dead Sea Scrolls
What Was Found at Qumran and Why It Mattered
- 20 chapters
- 33m
- Ancient History
- Free · no sign-up
The scrolls sparked debates over their age and origins, with some proposing dates as early as 2025. Chapters cover the complex process of publication, including copyright disputes and forgeries. Digital imaging and facsimile editions made the texts accessible to researchers and the public. The findings changed how scholars understand biblical texts.
This detailed account explores the scrolls' discovery, scholarly theories, and publishing history. Anyone interested in ancient history or biblical studies will find this worth their time.
Listen
-
Read this chapter
In late 1946 and early 1947, Bedouin shepherd Muhammed edh-Dhib discovered seven ancient scrolls in a cave near Qumran, including the Isaiah Scroll, Habakkuk Commentary, and Community Rule. He brought them back to camp, where they were displayed on a tent pole while the group considered their value. The Community Rule split in two. The Bedouins took the scrolls to Bethlehem dealer Ibrahim 'Ijha, who said they were worthless after being warned they might have been stolen from a synagogue. Undeterred, they went to a market where a Syrian Christian offered to buy them. A sheikh suggested taking them to Khalil Eskander Shahin, known as "Kando," a cobbler and antiques dealer. The Bedouins returned to the site, leaving one scroll with Kando and selling three others for seven Jordanian pounds.
In 1947, the first seven scrolls were noticed by Trever from the American Schools of Oriental Research, who studied their script and compared it to the Nash Papyrus, the oldest known biblical manuscript at the time, finding notable similarities. Then, in March 1948, the Arab–Israeli War led to some scrolls being moved to Beirut, Lebanon, for protection. On April 11, 1948, Millar Burrows, who led ASOR, told the press about the discovery of the scrolls.
-
Read this chapter
In November 1951, de Vaux led the ASOR team in beginning a full excavation at Qumran. By February 1952, Bedouins had found thirty fragments in what would become Cave 2. A second cave soon produced three hundred fragments from thirty-three manuscripts, including pieces of Jubilees and the Wisdom of Sirach in Hebrew. Then, on March 14, 1952, the ASOR team uncovered a third cave containing fragments of both Jubilees and the Copper Scroll. From September through December 1952, teams from ASOR discovered scrolls and fragments from Caves 4, 5, and 6.
As the historical importance of the scrolls became widely known, so did their value, prompting both Bedouins and archaeologists from ASOR to search actively in the same general area around Qumran. The site stretched more than a kilometre long. From 1953 to 1956, de Vaux directed four archaeological missions in the region, aiming to uncover scrolls and artifacts. In 1956, Cave 11 was found, yielding the final fragments discovered near Qumran.
In the early 1950s, archaeologists began uncovering scrolls in caves near Qumran, with Caves 4 through 10 located just 150 meters from the site, while Caves 1, 2, 3, and 11 were found about a mile north, with Cave 3 being the furthest. By February 2017, Hebrew University researchers announced they had discovered a new cave, Cave 12. Inside, they found one blank parchment in a jar, but broken scroll jars and pickaxes suggested that the cave had been looted in the 1950s.
In March 2021, Israeli archaeologists found dozens of Greek biblical fragments from the books of Zechariah and Nahum, dating to between 132 and 136 CE, during the Bar Kokhba Revolt. Among the finds was a 10,500-year-old basket made of woven reeds from the Muraba'at caves in the Nahal Darga Reserve. Also uncovered were the remains of a child wrapped in cloth, around 6,000 years old, and a cache of coins from the revolt period. That same year, more scrolls were discovered near the Dead Sea in a cave called the Cave of Horrors by Israeli authorities.
-
Read this chapter
In 1946, the first of the Dead Sea Scrolls was found in Cave 1 at Qumran, followed by more discoveries in the years that came. The scrolls were found in two main forms: as complete scrolls and as fragments, sometimes broken into as many as 15,000 pieces. One of the most challenging tasks for scholars was piecing together these fragments, a job that began with G.L. Harding, director of the Jordanian Department of Antiquities, but which he did not finish before his death in 1979. Among the original seven scrolls from Cave 1 were the Great Isaiah Scroll, the Community Rule Scroll, and the War Scroll, along with others like the Thanksgiving Hymns and the Genesis Apocryphon. One of the jars holding these ancient texts is now kept in the British Museum.
In February 1952, Bedouins found the first fragments of what would become the Dead Sea Scrolls in Wadi Qumran Cave 2, eventually uncovering 300 fragments from 33 manuscripts, including parts of Jubilees and the Wisdom of Sirach written in Hebrew. Later that year, on March 14, 1952, the ASOR team discovered Wadi Qumran Cave 3, which initially yielded fragments of Jubilees and the Copper Scroll.
In August 1952, explorers found Wadi Qumran Cave 4, which was then excavated by Harding, de Vaux, and Józef Milik from September 22 to 29 of that year. The cave actually consisted of two hand-cut sections labeled 4a and 4b, but since their fragments were mixed, they’re referred to as 4Q. Visible from the Qumran plateau to the south, Cave 4 became the most productive of all Qumran caves, yielding about 15,000 fragments from roughly 500 texts, including nine or ten copies of Jubilees, along with 21 tefillin and seven mezuzot. Shortly after Cave 4’s discovery, Cave 5 was found in 1952 and produced around twenty-five manuscripts.
In 1952, not long after Cave 4 was found, explorers discovered Wadi Qumran Cave 6 alongside Cave 5. This cave held fragments from about thirty-one manuscripts. A short time later, Cave 7 produced fewer than twenty Greek documents, including 7Q2, known as the "Letter of Jeremiah" or Baruch 6, and 7Q5, which sparked debate in later years. Cave 7 also contained a Greek version of a scroll of Enoch. Among other finds were several inscribed potsherds and jars.
In 1957, archaeologists began excavating Wadi Qumran Cave 8, one of only a few caves accessible by passing through the settlement at Qumran, situated at the southern end of the Qumran plateau. This cave yielded five manuscript fragments: one from Genesis, another from Psalms, a tefillin piece, a mezuzah, and a hymn. In addition to these texts, the cave produced several tefillin cases, a box filled with leather objects, many lamps and jars, and even the sole of a leather shoe. That same year, Cave 9 was also explored; like caves 7 and 8, it could be reached by walking through Qumran. Cave 9 contained only one manuscript fragment.
In Cave 11, archaeologists found 21 texts, including the long Temple Scroll, which is more than half about building the Jerusalem Temple. Scholar Yigael Yadin called it "The Torah According to the Essenes," but his friend Hartmut Stegemann disagreed, saying the scroll had no special importance and wasn't referenced in any known Essene writings.
In Cave 11, among other finds, was an eschatological fragment about Melchizedek, along with a copy of Jubilees and a proto-Masoretic text of the Torah scroll, specifically a fragment of Leviticus known as the Paleo-Hebrew Leviticus Scroll. Former chief editor John Strugnell noted that at least four scrolls from this cave remain privately held and unseen by scholars, including a complete Aramaic manuscript of the Book of Enoch. Then in February 2017, Cave 12 was discovered near Qumran, revealing signs of earlier looting, such as pickaxes and empty jars. One of the project’s lead researchers, Oren Gutfeld, said that although no scrolls were found, a piece of parchment inside a jug suggested that stolen scrolls had once been there.
Some of the scroll fragments found at Qumran don’t have clear records showing which cave they came from or where exactly in the area they were discovered. Because of this lack of specific archaeological details, these pieces can't be tied directly to the Wadi Qumran caves. They might have originated from other sites in the Judaean Desert instead. For that reason, they’ve been grouped together under a temporary designation: the “X” series.
-
Read this chapter
Qumran–Sectarian theories come from the idea that the people who lived at Qumran were responsible for writing the Dead Sea Scrolls, but they don’t all agree that those people were Essenes. Some scholars prefer not to say the sectarians were Essenes, even though that’s what many earlier theories suggested. These theorists believe a group of Jews living in or near Qumran wrote the scrolls, without necessarily identifying them as Essenes. The main difference is this hesitation to make that specific connection.
A specific idea about who lived at Qumran gained attention in the 1990s through the work of Lawrence H. Schiffman. He suggested the community was led by a group of Zadokite priests, also known as Sadducees. The main piece of evidence he pointed to is a document called "Miqsat Ma'ase Ha-Torah," or 4QMMT. This text includes purity rules that match what later rabbis said the Sadducees taught. The same document also outlines a festival calendar based on Sadducee methods for determining when certain holy days should be celebrated.
-
Read this chapter
Some scholars have argued that the scrolls came from Jews in Jerusalem who hid them in Qumran’s caves during the Roman destruction of the city in 70 CE. Karl Heinrich Rengstorf first suggested in the 1960s that they originated from the library of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. Later, Norman Golb proposed the scrolls came from multiple libraries in Jerusalem, not just the Temple one. Supporters of this theory say the variety of ideas and handwriting found in the scrolls supports a Jerusalem origin rather than Qumran. Archaeologists like Yizhar Hirschfeld, Yizhak Magen, and Yuval Peleg have also accepted that Qumran was likely a Hasmonean fort reused in later times, not the home of the scroll collection.
-
Read this chapter
In 1950, the first carbon dating test was done on linen found in one of the caves, and it dated to around 33 CE, plus or minus two hundred years. That ruled out early guesses that the scrolls were from the Medieval period. Later, two major sets of tests were carried out on the manuscripts. VanderKam and Flint summarized their findings, saying the tests provide “strong reason for thinking that most of the Qumran manuscripts belong to the last two centuries BCE and the first century CE.”
In 2025, researchers tested thirty scrolls using radiocarbon dating, with samples coming from the Qumran Caves, Masada, the Murabbaat caves, and the Nahal Hever caves. They also used a computer model called “Enoch” to help predict dates. This AI tool was trained on handwriting styles from 24 dated scrolls and helped date 135 previously undated manuscripts. The results showed that some scripts were older than expected, with evidence of scribal literacy possibly dating back to the second and third centuries BCE, and even earlier than the Hasmonean period.
-
Read this chapter
In 2025, a new study proposed older dates for some of the Dead Sea Scrolls, using artificial intelligence, updated radiocarbon dating, and handwriting analysis. The research was led by Mladen Popović from the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. A new AI model called “Enoch” was developed to help with the analysis. The team examined 135 manuscripts that had not been previously dated. This study suggests that some of the scrolls may be older than previously thought, based on these new methods and findings.
A fragmentary scroll known as 4Q114 from the Book of Daniel is now believed to date between 230 and 160 B.C.E., which pushes its creation some sixty years earlier than what scholars previously thought. This revision challenges earlier assumptions about when certain texts were written, offering new insight into the timeline of ancient manuscripts found at Qumran.
Analysis of the manuscripts reveals that the time frame for Herodian-type texts is much broader than earlier assumed. It is now suggested that they span from the second century CE back as far as the second century BCE. This broadened range means that the dating periods for both Herodian and Hasmonaean types overlap in certain areas. Such findings challenge previous assumptions about their relative ages and suggest a more complex timeline for when these texts were created.
-
Read this chapter
At the University of California, Davis, a cyclotron revealed that every black ink on the scrolls was carbon black. The red ink, meanwhile, was identified as cinnabar, or mercury sulfide. Only four of the Dead Sea Scroll fragments used this red pigment throughout the entire collection. Most black inks came from carbon soot produced by olive oil lamps, mixed with honey, oil, vinegar, and water to achieve the right thickness for writing. Sometimes galls were added to strengthen the ink. Writers applied the ink using reed pens.
The Dead Sea Scrolls were written on different materials, mostly parchment made from animal hide, known as vellum, which made up about 85.5 to 90.5 percent of the scrolls. A smaller portion, around 8 to 13 percent, was written on papyrus, and a very small amount, roughly 1.5 percent, was on bronze sheets composed of about 99 percent copper and 1 percent tin. Scholars from the Israeli Antiquities Authority, who used DNA testing to help piece together the scrolls, believe there might be a connection between the type of animal hide used and the religious importance of the texts. They think scrolls made on goat and calf hides were more significant, while those on gazelle or ibex hides were considered less so.
Tests conducted by the National Institute of Nuclear Physics in Sicily suggest that some of the parchment used in selected Dead Sea Scroll fragments originated in the Qumran area. Using X-ray and particle-induced X-ray emission analysis, researchers examined the water used in parchment production and compared it with water samples from around Qumran. The results point to a local source for the materials, supporting the idea that at least some of the scrolls were made near where they were found.
-
Read this chapter
After their discovery at Qumran, the scrolls were not handled properly by the people studying them. In the late 1940s and early 1950s, scholars used adhesive tape to repair broken pieces, which actually damaged the documents further. The government of Jordan understood how urgent it was to protect the scrolls from more damage, but they didn’t have enough money to buy all of them. So they allowed foreign groups to purchase the scrolls and keep them in a Jerusalem museum, where they would be studied properly later.
In the early months of 1953, the scrolls were transported to what was known as the Palestine Archaeological Museum, or the Rockefeller Museum, located in East Jerusalem, which was under Jordanian control at the time. The move itself caused additional harm to the fragile texts. The museum lacked sufficient funding and staff to properly care for the collection, leaving storage conditions inadequate by today’s standards. Many of the fragments were stored loosely between sheets of glass, a method that trapped moisture and accelerated decay.
During the Suez Crisis, the scrolls held at the Palestine Archaeological Museum were moved to the Ottoman Bank in Amman, Jordan. They were stored in the bank’s vault from 1956 to 1957. The damp conditions there caused mildew to grow on the scrolls and fragments. Some of the pieces were damaged or made hard to read because of the glue and paper from the manila envelopes they had been stored in while inside the vault.
By 1958, it became clear that up to five percent of some of the scrolls had completely deteriorated. Many texts were becoming illegible, and the parchments had darkened significantly. The scrolls continued to fall apart through the 1970s due to poor storage conditions, exposure to various adhesives, and damp environments. Fragments held by private collectors and scholars fared worse than those in museums, with large portions disappearing by 1966. By the late 1960s, the damage was so serious that both scholars and museum officials expressed major concern. Among the first to push for better preservation techniques were John Allegro and Sir Francis Frank.
Early efforts by both the British and Israel Museums to deal with the adhesive tape ended up exposing the parchment to a range of chemicals, including "British Leather Dressing", and darkening some of the fragments significantly. In the 1970s and 1980s, further attempts at preservation were made, such as removing the glass plates and replacing them with cardboard, as well as taking pressure off the plates that held the scrolls in storage. Yet during this time, the fragments and scrolls continued to deteriorate rapidly.
In 1991, the IAA set up a temperature-controlled lab to store and protect the scrolls. The team at the Rockefeller Museum worked hard to clean them, removing tape and oils that had been used to preserve them. They stored the fragile pieces using acid-free cardboard inside solander boxes, keeping them in a climate-controlled room to ensure their long-term survival.
-
Read this chapter
Between 1952 and 1967, a photographer named Najib Albina worked at the Palestine Archaeological Museum to document how the scrolls were sorted and put together. He had been trained by Lewis Larsson of the American Colony in Jerusalem. Using a kind of infrared photography known today as broadband fluorescence infrared or NIR photography, Albina and his team created more than 1,750 photographs of the scrolls and fragments. The scrolls were placed on animal skin and photographed with large format film, which made the text clearer and helped in reassembling the pieces. These early images are especially valuable because they show the collection before further decay, and they represent the most complete set of scrolls available at that time.
-
Read this chapter
In 1993, NASA began using digital infrared imaging technology to photograph fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Working with the Ancient Biblical Manuscript Center and West Semitic Research, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory built on earlier work in infrared photography for ancient manuscripts. They expanded the range of spectra used to capture images, improving the ability to see details in the fragile scroll pieces.
In 1993, NASA began using multispectral imaging techniques originally developed for remote sensing and planetary exploration to study the Dead Sea Scrolls. This method employed a liquid crystal tunable filter to capture images of the fragile fragments at specific wavelengths of light. By doing so, it reduced image distortion and revealed text that had previously been illegible under normal lighting. The camera and digital imaging assembly were specially built for photographing ancient texts that resist traditional methods. Using this approach on selected scrolls allowed researchers to uncover details invisible within the broader light spectrum.
On December 18, 2012, the first results of this project were revealed alongside Google at the site Deadseascrolls.org.il. That platform features older photographs from the 1950s, as well as around a thousand new images captured through multispectral techniques.
-
Read this chapter
Some of the scrolls and fragments from Qumran were published quickly after they were found. Most of the longer, more complete writings came out soon after their discovery. All the texts from Cave 1 made it into print between 1950 and 1956. Eight other caves' contents were released in 1963. Then in 1965, the Psalms Scroll from Cave 11 was published. Their English translations followed not long after.
Publication of the scrolls took many decades, with delays sparking academic controversy. A small group led by John Strugnell controlled access, while most scholars couldn’t even see photographs of the texts. Critics like Norman Golb, publisher Hershel Shanks, and others pushed for the scrolls to be made available to researchers. That debate ended in 1991, when the Biblical Archaeology Society published the “Facsimile Edition of the Dead Sea Scrolls,” after intervention from the Israeli government and the IAA. In the same year, Emanuel Tov was named chairman of the Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation, and publication began.
The scrolls were mostly small, fragile pieces, and the process of publishing them moved so slowly that many thought it was too slow. From the 1950s through the 1960s, scholars working at the Rockefeller Museum did much of the early work putting the fragments together and translating them. Access to the unpublished documents was restricted to just the editorial committee.
-
Read this chapter
After further delays, attorney William John Cox represented an undisclosed client who held the full set of unpublished photographs and arranged for their release. Robert Eisenman and James Robinson indexed the images and contributed an introduction to the A Facsimile Edition of the Dead Sea Scrolls, which the Biblical Archaeology Society published in 1991. Shortly afterward, Elisha Qimron brought suit against Hershel Shanks, Eisenman, Robinson, and the Biblical Archaeology Society, claiming they had published his decipherment of the MMT scroll without authorization or proper attribution. The District Court of Jerusalem ruled in Qimron's favor, imposing a restraining order and demanding that the defendants pay him NIS 100,000 for copyright violations and breach of attribution rights. The defendants appealed to Israel's Supreme Court, which upheld the ruling and ordered the return of all copies containing the unauthorized text. The judgment sparked criticism from scholars of copyright law both in Israel and internationally.
-
Read this chapter
In November 2007, the Dead Sea Scrolls Foundation asked the London publisher Facsimile Editions Limited to create a facsimile edition of three scrolls: The Great Isaiah Scroll, also known as 1QIsaa, The Order of the Community, or 1QS, and The Pesher to Habakkuk, or 1QpHab. This facsimile was made using photographs taken in 1948, which means it shows the Isaiah Scroll as it looked when it was first found, rather than how it appears now.
The first facsimile sets were shown in Seoul, South Korea, and one was bought by the British Library in London. In May 2009, it was announced that 46 more sets would be released, including reproductions of fragments from Cave 4—Testimonia (4Q175), Pesher Isaiahb (4Q162), and Qohelet (4Q109). These facsimiles were made on either specially prepared parchment paper or real parchment. The edition was limited to just 49 numbered sets. Some of the reproductions have been displayed in Qumran, at the Bibliothèque Nationale in Paris, and at the Vatican in Rome.
-
Read this chapter
Martin Abegg, Jr., who holds the Ben Zion Wacholder Professorship in Dead Sea Scroll Studies at Trinity Western University in Langley, British Columbia, Canada, has recorded and tagged the morphology of nearly all non-biblical scrolls. His work is accessible through Olive Tree Bible Software and Logos Bible Software on handheld devices.
In 2005, E.J. Brill made available on CD-ROM nearly all of the non-biblical Dead Sea Scrolls in a six-volume, 2,400-page set. The project was organized by Donald W. Parry and Emanuel Tov, who led the editorial team. This digital release differed from the physical translations found in Discoveries in the Judaean Desert, as these texts were sorted by genre—such as religious law, parabiblical works, calendrical and sapiental writings, and poetic and liturgical pieces.
On September 25, 2011, the Israel Museum launched a digital site for the Dead Sea Scrolls, making high-resolution images searchable and adding short videos and background info. Since then, five complete scrolls have been digitized and are available through the museum or Google Arts & Culture: the Great Isaiah Scroll, the Community Rule Scroll, the Commentary on Habakkuk Scroll, the Temple Scroll, and the War Scroll.
-
Read this chapter
Before the Dead Sea Scrolls were found, the oldest Hebrew Bible manuscripts we had were from the 10th century CE, like the Aleppo Codex. Now we know the oldest Masoretic Text manuscripts date to around the 9th century. But the scrolls pushed that timeline back more than a thousand years, to the 2nd century BCE. Scholars were eager to see if the scrolls would confirm or challenge how accurately the Bible had been copied over time. The discovery showed that the text had been preserved with remarkable precision, making it reasonable to trust today’s Hebrew Bible texts as faithful copies of the originals.
It’s remarkable that over the course of about a thousand years, the text changed very little. In my first article on the scroll, I said, "Herein lies its chief importance, supporting the fidelity of the Masoretic tradition." That statement was strongly challenged by Paul Kahle. He believed the scroll’s most important feature was how many real variant readings it contained—readings that are almost nowhere to be found in other Hebrew manuscripts of the Old Testament. To him, this showed us what those early biblical manuscripts looked like before they were adjusted to match a single standard version. I still think the scroll’s greatest value is how closely it matches the Masoretic text, but I also agree that these variants are its second major significance.
The biblical manuscripts found at Qumran show that the Old Testament text wasn't fixed until around A.D. 100. Some texts are very close to the Masoretic, or traditional, Hebrew text, but others—like those in Cave Four from books such as Exodus and Samuel—differ greatly in language and content. These discoveries have made scholars rethink how the biblical text developed, since it was once believed there were only three main manuscript families: the Masoretic, the Septuagint, and the Samaritan Pentateuch. Now it's clear that the text was much more fluid earlier on. Most of what was found at Qumran isn't biblical at all, but many of these non-biblical works were collected by the Essene community, not written by them. Some texts even predate the Essene period, when some biblical books were still being written or edited into their final form.
-
Read this chapter
The Dead Sea Scrolls include 235 biblical texts, about 22 percent of the total, and contain parts of all but one of the Hebrew Bible's books, which are also in the Christian Old Testament. Among these texts are ten deuterocanonical books, and four Jewish deuterocanonical books found in Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Bibles: Tobit, Sirach, Baruch 6, also called the Letter or Epistle of Jeremiah, and Psalm 151. The Book of Esther has not yet been discovered, with scholars suggesting it may be missing because its story of a Jewish woman marrying a Persian king could have been frowned upon by the Qumran community, or perhaps because the Purim festival it celebrates isn't part of their calendar.
Among the Dead Sea Scrolls, scholars found copies of nearly every book of the Hebrew Bible, including those considered deuterocanonical by Jewish tradition. The most frequently represented biblical books include Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Psalms, with multiple fragments and complete texts discovered at Qumran. These scrolls show how ancient scribes preserved and transmitted sacred scripture, offering insights into the religious life of Second Temple Judaism. Some texts are fragmentary, while others represent more complete copies of biblical works. The diversity and number of these manuscripts reveal the importance of scripture in the community that lived at Qumran. Each scroll contributes to our understanding of how biblical texts were understood and used in antiquity. These findings have reshaped scholarly views on the development of the Hebrew Bible.
-
Read this chapter
When the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in 1947 in what was then Mandatory Palestine, they were first taken to the Palestine Archaeological Museum. That museum was run by an international board. In November 1966, King Hussein of Jordan nationalized the museum. This happened after Jordan annexed the West Bank, which included East Jerusalem, following the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. From that point on, the responsibility for managing the museum fell to Jordan.
After the 1967 Arab–Israeli War, Jordan was defeated and Israel began occupying the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The Palestine Archaeological Museum, later renamed the Rockefeller Archaeological Museum, came under Israeli control. The Dead Sea Scrolls collection held there was then moved to the Shrine of the Book. Israel now claims ownership of the scrolls currently kept at the Israel Museum. That claim is being contested by both Jordan and the Palestinian Authority.
-
Read this chapter
In 1946, the first Dead Sea Scrolls came into view when Bedouin shepherds found them near Qumran. The scrolls were initially handled by a third party, George Isha'ya, a member of the Syriac Orthodox Church, who contacted St Mark's Monastery to assess what had been discovered. Metropolitan Athanasius Yeshue Samuel, known as Mar Samuel, examined the texts and suspected their ancient origins. He expressed interest in purchasing them, and four scrolls eventually came into his possession: the Isaiah Scroll (1QIsaa), the Community Rule, the Habakkuk Pesher, and the Genesis Apocryphon. Soon after, more scrolls appeared on the antiquities market, and Professor Eleazer Sukenik and Professor Benjamin Mazar from Hebrew University acquired three of them—the War Scroll, Thanksgiving Hymns, and another Isaiah Scroll (1QIsab).
In June 1954, four of the Dead Sea Scrolls appeared in an advertisement in The Wall Street Journal. By July 1, three people including Mar Samuel had arranged for the scrolls to be delivered to the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York. There, Professor Mazar and Yigael Yadin, the son of Professor Sukenik, purchased them for $250,000. That sum would be worth about $3 million in today’s money. The scrolls were then transported to Jerusalem.
-
Read this chapter
When people talk about the Dead Sea Scrolls, they’re usually thinking of the ancient manuscripts found near Qumran. But there’s a legal complication involving copyright that isn’t often discussed. Three kinds of materials connected to these scrolls have unclear copyright status. That uncertainty affects how they can be shared or used today.
The issue of copyright surrounding the Dead Sea Scrolls is complicated by differences in how various countries handle such laws. These legal variations create confusion when it comes to determining who holds the rights to the scrolls and their contents. Because copyright law isn't interpreted the same way everywhere, disputes can arise over access, publication, and use of the materials. This lack of uniformity makes it difficult to resolve questions about ownership and distribution. The ambiguity continues to affect how scholars and institutions work with these ancient texts today.
In 1992, Elisha Qimron sued Hershel Shanks of the Biblical Archaeology Society in an Israeli court, claiming copyright violations over reconstructed Dead Sea Scroll texts published without his permission. Qimron argued that since he had reconstructed about 40% of the text in his A Facsimile Edition of the Dead Sea Scrolls, it was his intellectual property. The case, Qimron v. Shanks, was decided in 1993 by Judge Dalia Dorner, who ruled in Qimron’s favor under both U.S. and Israeli copyright law, awarding the maximum compensation for aggravation. An appeal in 2000 upheld the decision in Israel’s Supreme Court, with Judge Aharon Barak ruling in Qimron’s favor. The case set two key principles for how facsimiles are judged under copyright law in both countries: authorship and originality.
The court’s ruling made it clear that while the "deciphered text" of the scrolls can be protected by copyright laws and owned by individuals or groups, the scrolls themselves are not subject to such protection. Scholars, according to U.S. copyright law professor David Nimmer, now have a degree of "freedom" in accessing and working with the material. Nimmer pointed out that this freedom was part of the legal theory, but in practice, the Israel Antiquities Authority tightly controlled access to the scrolls and their photographs.
Read
Free to download, keep and share. For general information only — not professional medical, legal or financial advice. Please consult a qualified professional.