The Terracotta Army
The Tomb of the First Qin Emperor
- 17 chapters
- 26m
- Asian History
- Free · no sign-up
Each figure was individually crafted with unique facial features, armor, and weapons. Archaeologists have studied the construction techniques, the mass grave of workers, and the sophisticated weaponry found at the site. Scientific research continues to reveal details about the preservation methods and possible influences from other cultures.
The central tomb of Qin Shi Huang remains unexcavated due to concerns over preserving its contents. This comprehensive guide explores the history, discovery, and ongoing research surrounding this ancient wonder. Anyone interested in ancient Chinese history or archaeological discoveries will find this detailed account rewarding.
Listen
-
Read this chapter
The tomb of China’s first emperor was built by conscripted workers, according to Sima Qian, the historian who wrote the Records of the Grand Historian, a work that became the first of China’s 24 dynastic histories. Construction began in 246 BCE, just after the young Qin emperor, then only thirteen years old, took the throne. Sima Qian reported that as many as 700,000 laborers were involved in the project. Centuries later, the geographer Li Daoyuan wrote that Mount Li was chosen for its rich resources—its northern side full of gold and its southern side known for beautiful jade—and that the first emperor, drawn by its fine reputation, selected it as his final resting place.
Sima Qian recorded that the first emperor lay buried with palaces, towers, and officials, along with precious items and strange treasures. His account described 100 rivers made of mercury, with a ceiling adorned with stars above, and beneath, a map of China’s unified territories. Some translations use terms like “models” or “imitations,” but those words do not appear in the original. The terracotta army is also absent from that description. Later, when the tomb site was discovered, traces of high mercury levels in the soil supported parts of Sima Qian’s story. The emperor was known to commission large statues during his rule, including the Twelve Metal Colossi, now lost but documented in history.
Later accounts say that Xiang Yu, one of the rivals for the throne after the first emperor died, stole from the mausoleum complex and the tomb itself. But there are signs the tomb may have stayed untouched.
-
Read this chapter
On 29 March 1974, farmers Yang Zhifa, his five brothers, and neighbour Wang Puzhi were digging a well near the Qin Emperor's tomb on Mount Li when they stumbled upon fragments of terracotta figures. The site, about 1.5 kilometers east of the burial mound, sits in an area known for its underground springs and waterways. For centuries, people had reported finding pieces of the ancient necropolis—roofing tiles, bricks, and masonry—but it wasn’t until this discovery that archaeologists like Zhao Kangmin investigated. What they found was the largest group of pottery soldiers ever unearthed. A museum complex now covers the area, with the largest pit enclosed under a roofed structure.
-
Read this chapter
The Terracotta Army sits within a vast burial complex known as a necropolis. Using ground-penetrating radar and core sampling, researchers have mapped its extent to about 98 square kilometres. That’s roughly 38 square miles of ancient territory. This sprawling area was built around the tomb of the first Qin Emperor, who ruled during China’s formative imperial period. The scale of the site reflects not only the power of this ruler but also the elaborate preparations made for his journey into the afterlife. Within this massive space, the army of clay soldiers stands as just one element of a much larger funerary landscape.
The necropolis was built to mirror the layout of the emperor’s imperial palace, spread across a vast area around his tomb. At the base of Mount Li, a pyramidal earth mound holds the burial site, surrounded by two strong walls made of rammed earth, each with a gateway. Inside this complex were various buildings including offices, halls, and stables, as well as an imperial park situated near the tomb mound.
The warriors stand guard to the east of the tomb, but over the centuries, up to five meters of reddish, sandy soil built up on top of the site. Archaeologists later found signs that the area had been disturbed even earlier. During excavations near the Mount Li burial mound, they uncovered several graves from the 18th and 19th centuries. Diggers from those times had apparently found terracotta fragments and tossed them aside, treating them as worthless. Those pieces were then mixed in with soil to fill in the excavations.
-
Read this chapter
The tomb of the First Qin Emperor is a sealed space about 100 by 75 metres across, and it has never been opened. Experts may be worried about how the artifacts inside would survive the process. For instance, once excavated, the painted surfaces on some terracotta figures began to flake and fade quickly. The lacquer that protected the paint can curl within fifteen seconds when exposed to Xi'an's dry air, and it can flake off completely in just four minutes.
-
Read this chapter
Four main pits have been uncovered at the site, each about seven meters deep. They lie roughly one and a half kilometers east of the burial mound. The soldiers were arranged as if guarding the tomb from the east, where the conquered states of the Qin Emperor once lay. These figures were found seven meters beneath the surface during excavation.
-
Read this chapter
Pit 1, the largest of the four pits, measures 230 meters long and 62 meters wide, holding more than 3,000 terracotta figures that make up the main army of the First Qin Emperor. The pit contains eleven parallel corridors, each over three meters wide, paved with small bricks and supported by wooden ceilings made of large beams and posts. This same architectural style was used in the tombs of nobles and would have resembled palace hallways when first constructed. Reed mats and layers of clay were applied over the wooden structures for waterproofing, and the area was then filled in with soil, raising it about two to three meters above the surrounding ground level once finished.
-
Read this chapter
The terracotta warriors are life-sized, standing between 1.75 and 2 meters tall, with officers typically taller than the rest. Each figure has a unique face, based on ten basic types that were then refined for individuality. They represent different military roles: armored and unarmored infantry, cavalrymen in pillbox hats, chariot drivers with helmets and extra protection, spear-carrying charioteers, kneeling crossbowmen or archers who are armored, standing archers who are not, and generals or lower-ranking officers. Uniforms vary within ranks—some wear shin guards, others don’t; some have long or short trousers, some padded—and body armor changes depending on rank, function, and position. The army also includes terracotta horses among the figures.
The warriors were originally painted with a rich array of pigments and materials. Ground precious stones, intensely fired bones, iron oxide, cinnabar, malachite, azurite, charcoal, and a unique mix known as Chinese purple or Han purple all contributed to their vivid appearance. Tree sap from the Chinese lacquer tree provided brown tones. These colors, applied in a lacquer finish, gave each figure a lifelike quality. Facial features were carefully detailed, with eyebrows and facial hair in black and faces rendered in pink. The combination of these materials and techniques brought the figures to life, making them more than mere clay—each warrior was a masterpiece of color and craftsmanship.
In Xi'an’s dry climate, the vibrant color coating on the terracotta warriors would begin to flake off almost immediately—within four minutes—after the mud covering them was removed. The army buried with the first Qin Emperor was meant to protect him in the afterlife, and these life-sized figures were painted in vivid hues before being placed in their underground tomb. But the harsh conditions of the region caused the pigments to fade quickly once exposed. This explains why most of what we see today appears as bare clay or faint traces of color, a reminder of how fragile the original artwork was. The warriors stand as silent witnesses to both their own beauty and the passage of time.
-
Read this chapter
In 1999, excavations in Pit K9901 revealed a group of terracotta sculptures known as "The Acrobats," notable for their detailed understanding of human anatomy. These figures, possibly representing acrobats or dancers, are fewer in number than the more famous warrior statues, with only about a dozen discovered so far. Dressed only in loincloths, they differ from the standard soldier figures in their vividness and less rigid poses. Their musculature and joint structures show advanced artistic skill, with some figures lean and others robust. Several appear mid-motion or making gestures, highlighting their dynamic portrayal. The statues demonstrate a sophisticated grasp of human form and proportion.
From Pit K9901, eleven of these figurines have been unearthed, seven of them in such good condition that they could be largely rebuilt from their shattered pieces.
-
Read this chapter
Since their discovery, the terracotta figures have been praised for their lifelike style and unique details, with no two warriors sharing the exact same facial features. In 1986, art historian German Hafner was the first to suggest a possible connection to Hellenistic art, noting the unusual naturalism of the sculptures compared to typical Qin era work, saying "the art of the terracotta army originated from Western contact." Later, archaeologist Duan Qingbo pointed to a similarity in style with Central Asian Khalchayan statuary from the 1st century BCE. Senior archaeologist Li Xiuzhen also considered Hellenistic influence, stating: "we now think the Terracotta Army, the acrobats and the bronze sculptures found on site were inspired by ancient Greek sculptures and art." She clarified that her comment was taken out of context by BBC reporters and emphasized that while Western culture may have inspired the army, it was uniquely created by the Chinese, with local elements also playing a role. She rejected the idea of direct knowledge transfer, such as a Greek artisan teaching Chinese workers, which she said the BBC misrepresented.
Johanna Hanink and Felipe Rojas Silva from Brown University suggested that ideas about foreign influence rest on outdated Eurocentric assumptions, assuming other cultures couldn’t create sophisticated art and instead forcing them into Western frameworks. Zhang Weixing, the chief archaeologist at the Mausoleum Site Museum, responded that there is no solid evidence supporting such connections. Raoul McLaughlin, an independent researcher studying Roman trade, also stated there's no Greek influence on the Terracotta Army, pointing out key differences in artistic style, materials, and symbolism. Meanwhile, Darryl Wilkinson from Dartmouth College argued that the naturalism seen in both the Qin dynasty figures and the pre-Columbian Moche culture shows that sculptural realism wasn’t unique to any one civilization.
-
Read this chapter
The terracotta army was built by government workers and local artisans using materials from the area, with each figure made from separate parts—heads, arms, legs, torsos—that were assembled and joined together. In 2021, studies showed the statues strongly resemble modern people from the region, leading some to believe they were modeled on real soldiers. The faces were created using molds, possibly at least ten different ones, with clay added after assembly to give each warrior a unique look. The legs were likely made like drainage pipes, suggesting an assembly-line method where parts were fired separately before being put together. Each workshop had to mark its name on the items they made, which helps historians track who worked on the project.
-
Read this chapter
In 2003, a grave pit was uncovered and excavated, revealing 121 skeletons identified as site workers from the tomb of the First Qin Emperor. Scholars determined most were between 15 and 40 years old, with an average height of about 170 centimeters. Studies using craniometric and genetic analysis tried to trace their origins. According to Duan Qingbo, the lead archaeologist and director of excavations from 1998 to 2006, DNA tests on 19 skeletons compared to 33 modern Chinese individuals showed the workers came from a mix of Han and minority ethnicities, with many originating from southern China.
-
Read this chapter
Most of the figures in the Terracotta Army originally held real weapons, meant to make them more lifelike, but most were either stolen soon after the army was created or have since rotted away. Still, archaeologists have recovered over 40,000 bronze weaponry items—swords, daggers, spears, battle-axes, scimitars, shields, crossbows, and triggers. The arrowheads, usually found in groups of 100, were likely made in self-sufficient workshops using a method called cellular production or Toyotism. Some weapons had a thin coating of chromium dioxide, once thought to protect them for 2,200 years, but research in 2019 showed that was just contamination from nearby lacquer. Instead, the slightly alkaline soil and its small particles most likely preserved the weapons.
These weapons were crafted from an alloy including copper, tin, and other elements like nickel, magnesium, and cobalt. Some bear inscriptions marking their creation between 245 and 228 BCE, showing they were made before the burial.
-
Read this chapter
In 2007, scientists from Stanford University and the Advanced Light Source facility in Berkeley reported that their analysis of terracotta figures showed the colored dye used was Chinese purple, made of barium copper silicate. They found this process came from knowledge developed by Taoist alchemists trying to make jade ornaments.
Since 2006, researchers at the UCL Institute of Archaeology have been studying the Terracotta Army using chemical analysis to learn how it was made. They examined 40,000 bronze arrowheads, grouping them in bundles of 100. Their findings showed that arrowheads within a single bundle had very similar chemical makeup, differing from other bundles. The presence or absence of certain metallic impurities was also consistent within each group. Based on this data, the team concluded that the production method resembled a modern cellular manufacturing system—like the one used at Toyota—rather than an early assembly line.
Under a scanning electron microscope, researchers have found grinding and polishing marks that show the earliest known use of lathes for finishing objects. These marks suggest that people in ancient times were already using industrial techniques to polish items, long before such methods were thought to exist. The evidence points to this practice being part of early manufacturing processes, highlighting how advanced some ancient technologies might have been. This discovery gives us a clearer picture of the tools and methods used in the past, especially when it comes to creating detailed and smooth surfaces on artifacts. It’s a small but significant clue into how people worked with materials so long ago.
A study from 2022 looked at the facial features of the terracotta warriors and found no significant difference when compared to modern Chinese populations, especially those from northern and western regions. But the research didn’t explore whether the warriors might have been portrayed with exaggerated or distorted features, nor did it consider how Chinese populations may have changed over time due to factors like climate and diet.
-
Read this chapter
In 1982, the first exhibition of the Terracotta Army outside of China opened at the National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne. Then, from 2003 to 2004, a tour of 120 life-sized replicas visited several cities in Germany, including Frankfurt, Munich, Oberhof, Berlin—specifically at the Palace of the Republic—and Nuremberg.
Between 9 May and 26 September 2004, a collection of terracotta warriors and other artifacts was shown to the public at the Forum de Barcelona in Barcelona, marking the most successful exhibition ever held there. The same display traveled to Madrid, where it was presented at the Fundación Canal de Isabel II between October 2004 and January 2005, again achieving their highest-ever attendance. Then, from 15 June through 17 September 2006, an exhibition titled "Los Guerreros de Terracota: Un Ejercito Inmortal" — "The Chinese Terracotta Army: An Immortal Army" — opened at the National Museum of Colombia in Bogotá, featuring 73 objects.
The First Emperor: China's Terracotta Army exhibition brought 120 objects from the mausoleum and 12 terracotta warriors to the British Museum in London from 13 September 2007 to April 2008, becoming the museum's most successful year, drawing more visitors than any other cultural attraction in the UK between 2007 and 2008. Advance tickets sold out quickly, prompting the museum to extend hours until midnight, yet crowds still overwhelmed the doors. On Chinese New Year day, gates had to shut due to the crush. The exhibition traveled next to North America, visiting museums including the Asian Art Museum of San Francisco, the Bowers Museum in Santa Ana, California, the Houston Museum of Natural Science, the High Museum of Art in Atlanta, the National Geographic Society Museum in Washington, D.C., and the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto. It then moved to Sweden, where it was hosted at the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities from 28 August 2010 to 20 January 2011. An exhibition titled 'The First Emperor – China's Entombed Warriors', presenting 120 artifacts, was hosted at the Art Gallery of New South Wales between 2 December 2010 and 13 March 2011. Another, entitled "L'Empereur guerrier de Chine et son armée de terre cuite", featuring statues from the mausoleum, was hosted by the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts from 11 February 2011 to 26 June 2011. In Italy, five warriors were displayed in Turin at the Museum of Antiquities from July 2008 to 16 November 2008, and nine statues including officials, lancers, and an archer were shown at the Royal Palace in Milan from 16 April 2010 to 5 September 2010 under the title "The Two Empires".
From April 3 through July 16, 2017, a show titled “Age of Empires: Chinese Art of the Qin and Han Dynasties” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City featured several Terracotta Army figures alongside other artifacts. Then, from April 8 to September 4, 2017, the Pacific Science Center in Seattle hosted an exhibition called “Terracotta Warriors of the First Emperor,” displaying ten figures and additional items before it moved to The Franklin Institute in Philadelphia, where it ran from September 30, 2017, to March 4, 2018, with the addition of augmented reality. Later, from February 9 to October 28, 2018, the World Museum in Liverpool presented an exhibit entitled “China's First Emperor and the Terracotta Warriors.”
In June 2025, the Western Australian Museum in Perth hosted an exhibition titled “Terracotta Warriors. Legacy of the First Emperor,” running through February 2026. Not long after, another show opened in Budapest, Hungary, at the Museum of Fine Arts, called “The Guardians of Eternity,” which ran from November 2025 to May 2026.
-
Read this chapter
Only a handful of figurines are known from before the terracotta army, making the humanistic and animalistic style likely appear dramatically new to ancient viewers. From the end of the Zhou dynasty, in the 4th and 3rd centuries BCE, very few and tiny terracotta warriors have survived. One such figure is the Taerpo horserider, a depiction of a cavalryman from a military tomb near Xianyang, in what was then the Qin state. The rider wears Central Asian, Scythian-style clothing, and his high, pointed nose suggests he is a foreigner. Still, these early statuettes are thought to lack the naturalistic and realistic quality of the later Qin terracotta army.
The terracotta army left a legacy, as later dynasties also created funeral armies, though in a less rigid and militaristic style, with much smaller figures. Examples include the Western Han Yangjiawan terracotta army from 195 BCE or the Yangling terracotta army from 141 BCE. Scholars have noted that the Qin emperor’s human-sized, monumental style was a relatively brief artistic phase, not to return until the 4th through 6th centuries CE with the rise of monumental Buddhist sculpture in China.
-
Read this chapter
Overview
The Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang, located in Lintong District near Xi'an, Shaanxi, was built for China’s first emperor, Qin Shi Huang, over a period of 38 years, from 246 to 208 BC. The tomb sits beneath a pyramid-shaped mound that rises 76 meters high. Its design mirrors the layout of Xianyang, the Qin capital, with an inner city measuring 2.5 kilometers around and an outer city stretching 6.3 kilometers. The main burial chamber lies in the southwest part of the inner city, facing east. Though the tomb itself has never been opened, excavations have focused on the larger necropolis around it, including the famous Terracotta Army to the east, which guards the site but remains only partially uncovered.
Historical records
Work on the mausoleum began when Emperor Qin was thirteen, but full construction started after he unified China in 221 BCE and finished around 208 BCE, about thirty-nine years later. According to Sima Qian, seventy thousand men were sent from across the empire to dig through three layers of groundwater and pour bronze into the outer coffin. The tomb was filled with rare treasures, and craftsmen made crossbows rigged to shoot at intruders. Mercury was used to represent rivers and seas, and candles made from "man-fish" fat were meant to burn forever. After burial, the Second Emperor ordered that all workers be trapped inside, and trees were planted to disguise the mound. Some scholars believe Sima Qian's account may have been exaggerated or even fictional, possibly written to influence Emperor Wu of Han. The mausoleum was later listed as a World Heritage Site in 1987.
Discovery of the Terracotta Army
In March 1974, villagers Yang Zhifa, his five brothers, and Wang Puzhi found fragments of terracotta, bronze arrowheads, and hardened dirt while digging a well near Xiyang in Lintong county. Yang threw pottery pieces aside and sold arrowheads to a commercial agency, while others used bricks for pillows. A local manager, Fang Shumiao, advised selling to the district cultural centre. Yang received 10 yuan for two carts of what would later be recognized as terracotta warriors. Zhao Kangmin from the centre bought all artifacts, including previously sold arrowheads. Archaeologists from Shaanxi visited in May 1974 to begin excavations at what became Pit 1. By May 1976, Pit 2 was discovered through drilling, and Pit 3 followed in July. Over 20,000 square meters were excavated, revealing about 7,000 warriors and horses, along with hundreds of weapons and chariots. A protective structure was completed by 1979. By 2008, a necropolis of six hundred pits had been uncovered, some located kilometers from the main tomb mound.
-
Read this chapter
Overview
Qin Shi Huang, born Ying Zheng in Handan around 259 BC, became China’s first emperor after uniting the warring states by 221 BC, ending centuries of conflict. He founded the Qin dynasty and created the title huángdì, meaning "emperor," which would be used for two millennia. With the help of minister Li Si, he standardized China’s systems, built roads, and connected old walls into the Great Wall. His reign also saw the burning of books and execution of scholars. He died in 210 BC during his fifth tour of eastern China, and though later portrayed as a tyrant, modern scholars debate that view, recognizing his lasting impact on Chinese history, as sinologist Michael Loewe noted: “few would contest the view that the achievements of his reign have exercised a paramount influence on the whole of China's subsequent history.”
Names
Qin Shi Huang, born Zheng, was known in ancient times as Zhao Zheng, with the clan name Zhao tied to his birthplace, though modern sources often list his name as Ying Zheng, using the ancestral surname Ying. He became the King of Qin in 221 BC after uniting China, then declared himself the First Emperor, a new title combining “huáng” from the Three Sovereigns and “dì” from the Five Emperors. His reign began with the title “King Zheng of Qin,” equal in status to the former rulers of Shang and Zhou. He chose the name Shi Huangdi for himself, meaning “First Emperor,” intending his line to continue through successive emperors, though that plan lasted only to his son. After becoming emperor, he made his personal name “Zheng” taboo, adopted the pronoun 朕 exclusively, and began calling himself “The Immortal.”
Birth and parentage
According to Sima Qian's Shiji, the first Qin emperor was the eldest son of Prince Yiren, who became King Zhuangxiang of Qin, and was born in Handan in 259 BC during the first month of the 48th year of King Zhaoxiang's reign. His father was serving as a hostage in Zhao at the time, and Yiren had married Lady Zhao, a concubine of the powerful merchant Lü Buwei. The boy was named Zhao Zheng, with the name "Zheng" coming from his birth month, Zhengyue, and "Zhao" from his father's lineage. Some accounts claim that Lady Zhao was already pregnant by Lü Buwei when she was given to Yiren, and that the emperor was actually Lü Buwei's son. Sinologist Derk Bodde suggested this story may have been added later to discredit the first emperor, while scholars like John Knoblock and Jeffrey Riegel called it "patently false," meant to insult both Lü Buwei and the emperor himself.
Read
Free to download, keep and share. For general information only — not professional medical, legal or financial advice. Please consult a qualified professional.