The Tunguska Event
The 1908 Siberian Airburst and What It Means for Impact Risk
- 11 chapters
- 27m
- Earth Sciences
- Free · no sign-up
The book covers scientific analysis of the blast pattern, models of the impactor's trajectory, and hypotheses about whether it was an asteroid or comet. It examines the glancing impact theory and compares Tunguska to the more recent Chelyabinsk meteor event. The work also discusses Lake Cheko, a possible impact crater, and other similar geophysical phenomena.
This detailed examination of one of history's largest known airbursts explains how scientists determined the event's cause and what it means for monitoring potentially dangerous near-Earth objects. Anyone interested in planetary science or impact risk will find this essential listening.
Listen
-
Read this chapter
On 30 June [O.S. 17 June] 1908, around 7:14 in the morning, Evenki natives and Russian settlers in the hills northwest of Lake Baikal witnessed a bluish light moving across the sky, nearly as bright as the Sun, leaving a thin trail. Closer to the horizon, a flash produced a billowing cloud, followed by a pillar of fire that cast red light on the landscape. The pillar split in two and faded, turning black. About ten minutes later, sounds like artillery fire were heard, with witnesses reporting the source moved from the east to the north of them. The sounds were accompanied by a shock wave that knocked people off their feet and broke windows hundreds of kilometers away.
The Tunguska explosion of 1908 was so powerful it was felt across vast distances, recorded by seismic stations all the way from Germany and Denmark to Croatia and the United Kingdom. Even farther away, in Batavia, Dutch East Indies—now Indonesia—and Washington, D.C., people detected the shock waves. In some locations, the blast created a pressure wave equal to a 5.0-magnitude earthquake on the Richter scale.
Over the next few days, night skies across Asia and Europe glowed brightly. There are reports of photographs taken at midnight—without flashbulbs—in places like Sweden and Scotland, showing clearly lit scenes. Scientists have theorized that this glow came from light passing through ice particles high in the atmosphere, formed by the explosion's extreme cold. This same phenomenon was later recreated on a smaller scale by Space Shuttles decades later. In the U.S., the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory at Mount Wilson Observatory in California noted a months-long drop in atmospheric clarity, matching what would be expected from increased dust particles in the air.
-
Read this chapter
At breakfast time in 1908, Semenov was sitting by the house at Vanavara Trading Post when he saw the sky split in two directly to the north, over Onkoul's Tunguska Road. Fire appeared high and wide over the forest, and the northern side filled with flame. He felt so hot he thought his shirt was on fire, the heat coming from that direction. Then the sky shut closed, a strong thump sounded, and he was thrown several meters. He lost consciousness briefly, but his wife led him to the house. After that, noise like rocks falling or cannons firing came, the Earth shook, and he pressed his head down, fearing for his life. When the sky opened again, hot wind raced between the houses, leaving traces in the ground like pathways, damaging crops and shattering windows. In the barn, part of an iron lock snapped.
At the river with my brother Chekaren, we slept in our hut when we both woke to whistling and strong wind. Chekaren asked, "Can you hear all those birds flying overhead?" We couldn't see outside. Then I was shoved hard, falling into the fire. We cried out for father, mother, brother, but no one answered. Trees crashed down, and we heard them falling. We tried to run, but the first thunder struck. The ground shook, the wind toppled our hut. My body was pushed down by sticks, but my head stayed clear. Then I saw it: trees falling, branches on fire, a light so bright it felt like a second sun, my eyes hurt, I even closed them. It was like Russian lightning. And then came the second thunderclap. The morning was sunny, no clouds—our Sun shone as usual—and suddenly there came a second one. Chekaren and I struggled free from under the hut. Then we saw another flash above, in a different place, followed by loud thunder. That was the third thunder strike. Wind hit us again, knocked us off our feet, struck the fallen trees.
We stood amid the wreckage of fallen trees, watching limbs snap off like matchsticks and flames consume the forest. Then Chekaren shouted, “Look up,” and motioned toward the sky. When I followed his hand, I saw another flash—another boom. The sound was fainter this time. That felt like the fourth strike, just like regular thunder. But there was one more—small, distant, as if it were happening where the sun goes to rest at night.
On the morning of June 17th, around 9:00 UTC+7, villagers in Karelinski, about 200 versts north of Kirensk, saw a strange, bright bluish-white object moving downward in the sky. It looked like a "pipe," a cylinder, and lasted about ten minutes. The sky was clear except for a small dark cloud nearby. As it descended into the forest, the object began to smudge, then turned into a large black smoke billow, followed by a loud knocking sound—like stones falling or artillery firing. The ground shook, and buildings in Kirensk rattled. People panicked, crying and running into the streets, thinking the end had come. At the same time, a second witness in the forest about six versts north heard repeated artillery sounds every fifteen minutes for at least ten times.
At 7:43 on the 17th, residents of Kezhemskoye village were startled by a sound like strong wind, followed immediately by a terrifying thump, then another, then a third. The ground shook violently, as if structures had been struck by a massive log or rock. Between the first and third impacts came a deep, rumbling noise beneath the surface—like the movement of dozens of trains all at once. For five to six minutes afterward, the sound of artillery fire echoed in short, equal bursts, about fifty to sixty salvoes that gradually faded. About 1.5 to 2 minutes later, six more distinct thumps followed, loud and trembling, resembling cannonfire. Near Lovat village, in the Kansk uezd, two powerful explosions were reported, as though from large-caliber artillery.
-
Read this chapter
Since the 1908 explosion, around a thousand scholarly papers have been written about the Tunguska event, most in Russian. Because of the site’s remote location and the lack of instruments at the time, scientists have had to rely on damage reports and later geological studies to figure out what happened. Energy estimates have ranged widely, from three to thirty megatons of TNT. It wasn’t until more than a decade later that any serious scientific study began. In 1921, the Russian mineralogist Leonid Kulik led an expedition to the Podkamennaya Tunguska River basin. Though he never reached the center of the blast, local accounts convinced him a large meteorite had struck the area. He urged the Soviet government to fund another mission, hoping to find meteoric iron.
In 1927, Kulik led a scientific team to the Tunguska site, hiring local Evenki hunters to guide them. They searched for an impact crater but found none at ground zero. Instead, they discovered a zone about 8 kilometers across where trees were scorched, branchless, yet still standing. Further out, trees showed partial scorching and had been knocked down, forming a large radial pattern. By the 1960s, researchers determined the affected area covered 2,150 square kilometers, shaped like a giant butterfly with a wingspan of 70 kilometers and body length of 55 kilometers. Kulik noticed holes he mistakenly believed were meteorite craters, though he lacked the tools to properly excavate them.
During the next ten years, three more expeditions went to the area. Kulik found dozens of small bogs, each ten to fifty meters across, wondering if they might be meteor craters. One, called "Suslov's crater," was drained after much effort, but an old tree stump was found at the bottom, ruling out a meteor origin. In 1938, Kulik arranged for an aerial survey covering 250 square kilometers. The original negatives—1,500 of them—were destroyed in 1975 by order of Yevgeny Krinov. Positive prints were saved in Tomsk. Expeditions in the 1950s and 1960s found microscopic spheres in soil samples. Later studies identified similar spheres in tree resin, showing high nickel content typical of meteorites. Their distribution matched what would be expected from an airburst, and unusual metal ratios further supported their extraterrestrial origin.
Chemical analysis of peat bogs near the Tunguska explosion site showed unusual isotopic signatures in carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen from the 1908 layer, which didn’t match the surrounding layers and were absent in bogs outside the area. These anomalies also included an unusually high amount of iridium, similar to what’s found at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary. Scientists believe this debris came from the exploding object and that nitrogen was deposited as acid rain. However, some researchers have questioned these findings, noting that while certain papers report isotopic compositions matching CI and CM carbonaceous chondrites and iridium anomalies in Tunguska peat layers, other labs haven’t been able to confirm those results.
Researcher John Anfinogenov proposed that a boulder known as “John’s stone,” found at the event site, came from the meteorite itself. However, oxygen isotope testing on the quartzite revealed it formed through hydrothermal processes, likely connected to magmatism from the Permian-Triassic Siberian Traps. In 2013, another group published findings from micro-samples taken from a peat bog close to where the explosion occurred; these samples appear to contain material of possible extraterrestrial origin.
It's often said that the explosion felled over 80 million trees, but that estimate was just a rough calculation based on tree density and the area affected. That method ended up overstating the damage by about four times, so it’s probably wrong. The biggest trees actually brought down were around 44 centimeters across—about 17 inches—and not the meter-wide trunks some accounts have suggested.
-
Read this chapter
The Tunguska Event of 1908 was likely caused by a meteor air burst, with an asteroid about 6 to 10 kilometers wide exploding 4 to 6 miles above Earth’s surface. Every day, meteoroids enter our atmosphere from space, moving at speeds of at least 11 kilometers per second—what's called the escape velocity of Earth. As they travel through the air, the intense heat from ram pressure causes most to burn up or explode before hitting the ground. Early estimates of the explosion’s energy ranged from 10 to 30 megatons of TNT, depending on how high the object burst, with calculations based on scaling laws used for nuclear weapons effects.
More recent calculations that account for the object’s momentum show that a greater portion of the energy was directed downward than it would have been in a nuclear explosion. These estimates place the air burst's energy between 3 and 5 megatons, or roughly 13 to 21 petajoules. One estimate puts the energy at 15 megatons—about 1,000 times more powerful than the Trinity nuclear test in 1945. That’s comparable to the Castle Bravo test in 1954, which measured 15.2 megatons, and about one-third the power of the Tsar Bomba test in 1961. A 2019 paper suggests the actual explosive force may have been as high as 20 to 30 megatons.
Since the second half of the 20th century, scientists have been watching Earth's atmosphere closely, using infrasound and satellite technology, and they've found that asteroid air bursts with energies similar to nuclear weapons happen regularly—though events as powerful as Tunguska, which released about 5 to 15 megatons of energy, are much rarer. Eugene Shoemaker calculated that 20 kilotons' worth of explosions occur every year, and that a Tunguska-sized blast happens about once every 300 years. More recent estimates suggest it's closer to once every thousand years, with five-kiloton air bursts happening about once per year. Most of these are believed to come from asteroids rather than comets, based on how deeply they penetrate the atmosphere. The largest asteroid air burst recorded with modern tools was the 500 kilotons of energy from the Chelyabinsk meteor in 2013, which broke windows and left behind meteorites.
-
Read this chapter
In 2020, Russian scientists ran computer models to figure out what happened during the 1908 Tunguska event. They tested how asteroids between 50 and 200 meters across would behave if they hit Earth’s atmosphere at a shallow angle. The models considered whether the object was made of iron, rock, or ice. The best match for the explosion they observed was an iron asteroid up to 200 meters wide, moving at 11.2 kilometers per second. It didn’t fully enter the atmosphere but instead skimmed off it and went back into space.
-
Read this chapter
The damage caused by the explosion near the center resembled what was seen during Operation Blowdown, a large-scale test conducted in Australia. This type of destruction comes from the powerful blast wave created when something explodes in the air. Trees directly under the blast were stripped bare but stayed upright, while those further out were flattened. That happened because the force of the wave changed direction as it moved outward, traveling more horizontally by the time it reached them.
In the mid-1960s, Soviet scientists ran experiments that mimicked the Tunguska explosion using model forests made of matches and wire stakes, along with small charges dropped by wire. These tests produced blast patterns shaped like butterflies, much like the one found at the actual site. The experiments suggested the object had come in at about a 30-degree angle from the ground and 115 degrees from north, and that it detonated while still in the air.
-
Read this chapter
In 1930, F. J. W. Whipple, a British meteorologist and mathematician, proposed that the object that caused the Tunguska explosion was a small comet. Comets are made of dust and volatiles like water ice and frozen gases, which could have been entirely vaporized on entering Earth’s atmosphere, leaving no physical evidence behind. This idea gained support from observations of glowing skies—what were called “skyglows” or “bright nights”—seen across Eurasia for several evenings after the event. These phenomena may have been caused by dust and ice from the comet’s tail spreading into the upper atmosphere. By the 1960s, this cometary explanation had become widely accepted among Soviet Tunguska researchers.
In 1978, Slovak astronomer Ľubor Kresák proposed that the Tunguska object was a fragment of Comet Encke, a periodic comet with a three-year orbit inside Jupiter’s path. That comet is also linked to the Beta Taurids, an annual meteor shower peaking around June 28–29. The Tunguska explosion happened during that shower's peak, and the object’s trajectory matches what you'd expect from such a fragment. A risk corridor has since been calculated showing the impactor could have hit North America if it had arrived just minutes earlier. These objects are now known to explode dozens to hundreds of kilometers above Earth, something military satellites have observed for decades. In 2019, astronomers searched for asteroids about 100 meters wide from the Taurid swarm between July 5–11 and July 21–August 10, but as of February 2020, no such objects were found.
In 2001, a study by Farinella, Foschini, and colleagues used orbital modelling from atmospheric trajectories to calculate the odds, concluding an 83% chance the object came from the asteroid belt rather than a cometary path, which had only 17%. That same year, Zdeněk Sekanina’s earlier critique of the comet idea was reinforced, as he noted that a body made of cometary material, travelling on such a shallow angle through the atmosphere, should have disintegrated, yet the Tunguska object apparently remained intact. Sekanina argued instead for a dense rocky object, likely of asteroidal origin. Some supporters of the comet theory have suggested the object might have been an extinct comet with a stony outer layer that allowed it to survive the journey.
The main problem with the idea that something rocky hit Earth is that there should have been a big hole from the impact, and none has ever been found. One explanation is that the object broke apart in the air, exploding so violently that nothing large survived, and the debris spread into the upper atmosphere, causing the bright skies seen afterward. In 1993, scientists suggested the object was about 60 meters wide, made of rock similar to some meteorites but not quite like the kind that hold water. Carbonaceous chondrites, which often contain water, usually dissolve quickly unless they’re frozen.
When a stony asteroid enters the atmosphere, models developed by Christopher Chyba and others suggest it can break apart mid-descent if the forces pushing against it exceed the strength holding it together. This causes the object to explode in the air, releasing almost all its energy at once. The result is no crater, but damage spread across a wide area. Most of the destruction comes from the intense heat generated by the blast.
During the 1990s, researchers from Italy, led by physicist Giuseppe Longo of the University of Bologna, studied tree cores from the 1908 impact area to analyze trapped particles from the event. They discovered that the material contained high levels of elements typically found in rocky asteroids, a composition that is uncommon in comets.
Kelly et al. (2009) argued the Tunguska event was caused by a comet, pointing to sightings of noctilucent clouds after the impact— a sign of water vapor in the upper atmosphere. They drew a comparison between these clouds and the exhaust plume from NASA's Endeavour Space Shuttle. In 2009, Russian researcher Edward Drobyshevski suggested the near-Earth asteroid 2005 NB56 might be the object’s parent body, noting that it passed within 0.06945 astronomical units of Earth on June 27, 1908—just three days before the explosion. The team believed its orbit matched the Tunguska object’s modeled path, even factoring in weak non-gravitational forces. Then, in 2013, a joint US-European analysis of fragments from the site supported an iron meteorite origin.
-
Read this chapter
In February 2013, a bolide exploded over Chelyabinsk, Russia, giving scientists new data to study the Tunguska event of 1908. Using information from both incidents, researchers ran a statistical analysis of more than 50 million possible combinations of entry speeds, altitudes, and impactor properties that could have caused Tunguska-scale damage. Four computer models came to similar conclusions: the most likely culprit was a stony object between 50 and 80 meters in diameter, entering at about 55,000 kilometers per hour, exploding between 10 and 14 kilometers above ground, and releasing energy equivalent to 10 to 30 megatons—similar to the volcanic eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980. Such impacts occur only once every few millennia on average.
-
Read this chapter
In June 2007, scientists from the University of Bologna said they found a lake in the Tunguska area that might be an impact crater from the 1908 event. They don’t question that the object exploded in the air, but they think a piece about ten meters across made it through and hit the ground. That lake is called Lake Cheko. It’s a small, bowl-shaped body of water located roughly eight kilometers north-northwest of where the explosion happened.
The idea that Lake Cheko was created by the Tunguska explosion has faced opposition from other experts in impact craters. In 1961, an investigation rejected the notion of a recent origin for the lake, citing thick silt layers on its floor as proof it was at least 5,000 years old. Yet newer studies indicate that only about a meter of that sediment results from normal lake processes, pointing to a much younger age of roughly 100 years. Sonar scans show the lake bed takes a conical shape, matching what’s expected from an impact crater. Magnetic surveys also detected a possible metre-sized rock fragment beneath the deepest part of the lake. Lastly, the direction of the lake’s long axis aligns with the epicenter of the Tunguska blast, about 7.0 kilometers away. Scientists are still working to confirm how the lake came to be.
Lake Cheko sits in Siberia near the 1908 Tunguska explosion epicenter, and some scientists believe it may have formed in a crater made by a fragment of a cosmic body. A core taken from the lake’s center, 175 centimeters long, shows a clear change near the time of the event. The upper part, about a meter thick, is made of fine lacustrine deposits sitting on coarser chaotic material. Dating using 210Pb and 137Cs places this shift close to 1908. Pollen found in the top layer indicates aquatic plants were present after the explosion, but not before. Organic carbon, nitrogen, and carbon isotope data also support the idea that Lake Cheko formed at the time of the Tunguska event.
Pollen found in lake sediments shows two distinct layers, one above and one below about 100 centimeters down. The upper layer, within the last 100 centimeters, includes pollen from taiga trees like Abies, Betula, Juniperus, Larix, Pinus, Picea, and Populus, along with remains of aquatic plants such as Callitriche, Hottonia, Lemna, Hydrocharis, Myriophyllum, Nuphar, Nymphaea, Potamogeton, and Sagittaria—plants that grow in water up to four meters deep. This suggests a lake existed there, similar to today’s conditions. In contrast, the lower layer has tree pollen but no signs of aquatic plants, indicating a taiga forest once grew on marshy land. Pollen and microcharcoal show that forest coverage decreased over time, likely due to fires, then again after the Tunguska Event and the formation of Lake Cheko between 100 and 90 centimeters down, followed by another fire in the top 40 centimeters.
In 2017, Russian scientists published new research challenging the idea that the Tunguska explosion created Lake Cheko. By studying sediment from the lake’s floor, they found a layer contaminated with radionuclides from nuclear tests at Novaya Zemlya in the mid-20th century. This layer helped them calculate how fast sediments had built up—between 3.6 and 4.6 millimeters per year. That rate is less than half of what Gasperini et al. had estimated in their 2009 study based on a core taken in 1999. The Russian team counted at least 280 annual layers in a 1260-millimeter-deep sample, proving the lake is far older than the Tunguska event.
There are issues with how impact physics works in this case. It’s unlikely that a stony meteorite of the right size would have had the strength to survive its journey through the atmosphere intact. Even if it did, it wouldn’t have kept enough speed to dig out a crater as large as the one found near the Tunguska Event site. The mechanics of how such an object could have done that are still being debated. Scientists continue to study what happened in 1908, and questions remain about the nature of the object and how it interacted with Earth’s surface.
-
Read this chapter
While most scientists agree that the Tunguska explosion resulted from a small asteroid impact, one alternative theory exists. Astrophysicist Wolfgang Kundt suggests the event was caused by the release and sudden explosion of 10 million tons of natural gas rising from deep within the Earth’s crust. According to his idea, the gas escaped upward until it reached an altitude matching its density in the air. It then moved downwind like a wick, drifting until it encountered a spark—possibly lightning. Once ignited, the fire traveled along this gas pathway, eventually reaching the surface where the leak originated, triggering a massive explosion.
Another theory about what happened in 1908 involves a type of explosion called a verneshot, which some researchers have suggested could explain the Tunguska event. In addition, other scientists have put forward a geophysical explanation for the occurrence.
-
Read this chapter
On 15 February 2013, a meteoroid exploded over Chelyabinsk in Russia’s Ural district, creating an air burst that injured more than 1,200 people. The object, an asteroid about 17 to 20 meters across, had an initial mass of roughly 11,000 tons and released energy equivalent to 500 kilotons. Its shock wave shattered windows, sending glass fragments into buildings and causing the injuries. This event was a smaller version of what happened in 1908 at Tunguska, though it occurred in a populated area and left a clear impact on human life.
A powerful meteor air burst shook the skies again in 2018, this time occurring near the Kamchatka Peninsula on December 18th. It ranked as the third most significant meteor event recorded since 1900. The two larger ones were the Chelyabinsk meteor in February 2013 and the Tunguska explosion.
Read
Free to download, keep and share. For general information only — not professional medical, legal or financial advice. Please consult a qualified professional.